I think so much of this comes from theme parks of all stripes increasingly being dominated by thrill rides and roller coasters consequently being seen as the "real" reason to go to parks, with everything else just filler. At one point, in the wake of Disneyland, parks really did try and appeal to families first and foremost, now seemingly everyone else has given up with that idea and even Disney is feeling/has felt the heat to add more thrill rides.
I've talked to multiple people whose impressions of Disney parks was that it would be basically Six Flags with Disney characters instead of Looney Tunes. It took long, frequent conversations to the effect of "some attractions involve you sitting and doing nothing while watching a bird show" to convince my grandparents to go to WDW.
In a way it's fascinating (if not at times depressing) the way that Disney parks according to people who have never been are either parks for five year olds or die hard thrill seekers with nothing in between, with very few people seeing them as being for everyone. I'd blame Disney for it if I didn't know from many, many years of experience how utterly unwilling most people are to research what a park actually offers before they buy a ticket.
As an IL resident, I used to hear constantly from people that I'd be disappointed with Disneyland basically because "it's smaller." It was invariably from people that either had never been or hadn't been in 30 years. Those conversations didn't really stop until finally people figured out I was going to keep going back.Agree with all of this.
A recent example is someone I work with.
She has been convinced for the past decade that WDW was just for toddlers, and there was nothing she would be interested in experiencing as a 20-something.
Unbelievable…and she was puzzled as to why I visit yearly or sometimes more as a 50-something.
Like a parent, I gave her ‘the talk’…and encouraged her to try it out the next time she visits Florida.
And you know what…?
After I pointed out some things she might enjoy, and her giving it a chance, she came back from a visit a changed gal.
Now, she ‘gets it’ and better understands why it is not just for toddlers, young families, and ‘those weirdo Disney people /fans’.
Her next visit is next month…third within the past two years.
Mission accomplished.
Also reminds me of the time I had to convince another friend to give Disneyland a try.
He was convinced because the Park was ‘smaller’ there was ‘less to do’ and it wouldn’t be as ‘good as WDW’.
Oh boy….where have we heard this before?
Got him properly straighted out as well…
Took all of ten minutes inside the gate at Disneyland to change him permantly.
Now he is a ‘lifer’.
(I will happily take my payment of a Silver Pass now, Mickey, for my four decades of promotional work for your Company. )
-
As an IL resident, I used to hear constantly from people that I'd be disappointed with Disneyland basically because "it's smaller." It was invariably from people that either had never been or hadn't been in 30 years. Those conversations didn't really stop until finally people figured out I was going to keep going back.
Most people here don't really get why people would go to California more generally, partly because of politics (or at least, perceptions thereof), because Florida on the surface appears similar, and because to get to California requires a flight or days worth of driving to get to, few have actually been. The sooner people come to the realization that few people piping up about these places actually know what they're talking about, the better, but then many people are so invested in holding onto beliefs that don't have a lick of truth on them that I'm sure it won't happen for most.
Oh, it is-especially when it comes to the castle park.Those people can go to WDW. But I don’t have any interest to go see WDW.
I still feel Disneyland is way superior in attractions line up.
Oh, it is-especially when it comes to the castle park.
But as much as I and many others rag on WDW, there are things they are better at than DLR, and I really do think that if you love these places, you should try, assuming the correct alignment of time/money/interest, to see them all. Every one of them has something that I feel makes it worth the journey-if not in isolation, then perhaps in combination with some other nearby attractions at the very least.
And WDW has two parks in Epcot and DAK that are unique and offer things that will never make it to any other park, and that doesn't even get into their hotel and restaurant game. The resort-first mentality of WDWers isn't something I will ever subscribe to, but in spite of many things I wouldn't do if I were in their shoes and other things I don't care for, the place does have legions of fans for a reason-and it's not just because East Coasters haven't found Disneyland yet.
It won't be for awhile yet, but I do look forward to the day that I get to experience Kilimanjaro Safaris, their excellent TOT, their chaotic-Matterhorn-in-the-dark version of Space Mountain, and wander World Showcase again-even as I snark about some of their other choices while I wander the parks.
While you are certainly entitled to your opinion but you don’t have to be here if you don’t like how this site is run or the art they use, no one is forcing you.
You being a defender AI slop might be the least surprising fact I've learned about you.While you are certainly entitled to your opinion but you don’t have to be here if you don’t like how this site is run or the art they use, no one is forcing you.
I’m defending this site, and Steve’s right to run it how he sees fit. A site that you signed up for freely of your own accord and use for free.You being a defender AI slop might be the least surprising fact I've learned about you.
As a long time Disneyland AP holder and someone who only gets to do a big trip every 3 years or so, constantly hearing how much better DLR is than WDW does give me cold feet on pulling the trigger on a WDW trip sometimes. But ultimately I’m at the point where i need to finally cross it off my bucket list. The sheer curiosity of experiencing this “mythical” place that I’ve kicked down the road all these years outweighs the rest. It also helps that my daughter is now at a height where we wouldn’t have to be rider switching our way through Disney World. Which is the main reason we chose a Disney Cruise in 2023 over WDW despite flying to Florida.
Obviously it’s the vacation bubble aspect of WDW that really sets it apart and can’t be duplicated. Of course I wonder if my personality would even let me enjoy that part of it or If I’d be running from park to park trying to see and do as much as I can.
A part of me also wonders if I should do TDR or DLP before WDW. Prices are fairly comparable. I realized recently that outside of Sicily pretty much all my vacationing has taken place in Hawaii, Mexico, the Caribbean and Florida (never WDW). Multiple times to each. So I do have the urge to see new parts of the world and you can do worse than Paris or Tokyo. But of course the flights are not as short/ convenient as Florida. So that's not ideal with the kids.
As far as the parks, my issue with Paris, as much as I'd personally love to see that beautiful park is that I'm not sure how much the kids would get out of it considering all of their attractions are pretty much DL/ DCA the remix. Tokyo has a lot more to offer in that regard but outside of three days in the parks I'm not sure how much the kids would get out of Tokyo. What WDW has going for it is that it feels like the right destination for the family for right now even though it doesn't scratch my international travel itch. You also knock out 4 parks (instead of just two) and a whole lot of unique attractions for a lifelong Disneylander. Not to mention you can end your trip with a Disney cruise which sounds nice (and expensive).
Aren’t you at the parks right now? How’s your trip going?
If it were me, take them to Paris. So much to see outside of Disneyland Paris.As a long time Disneyland AP holder and someone who only gets to do a big trip every 3 years or so, constantly hearing how much better DLR is than WDW does give me cold feet on pulling the trigger on a WDW trip sometimes. But ultimately I’m at the point where i need to finally cross it off my bucket list. The sheer curiosity of experiencing this “mythical” place that I’ve kicked down the road all these years outweighs the rest. It also helps that my daughter is now at a height where we wouldn’t have to be rider switching our way through Disney World. Which is the main reason we chose a Disney Cruise in 2023 over WDW despite flying to Florida.
Obviously it’s the vacation bubble aspect of WDW that really sets it apart and can’t be duplicated. Of course I wonder if my personality would even let me enjoy that part of it or If I’d be running from park to park trying to see and do as much as I can.
A part of me also wonders if I should do TDR or DLP before WDW. Prices are fairly comparable. I realized recently that outside of Sicily pretty much all my vacationing has taken place in Hawaii, Mexico, the Caribbean and Florida (never WDW). Multiple times to each. So I do have the urge to see new parts of the world and you can do worse than Paris or Tokyo. But of course the flights are not as short/ convenient as Florida. So that's not ideal with the kids.
As far as the parks, my issue with Paris, as much as I'd personally love to see that beautiful park is that I'm not sure how much the kids would get out of it considering all of their attractions are pretty much DL/ DCA the remix. Tokyo has a lot more to offer in that regard but outside of three days in the parks I'm not sure how much the kids would get out of Tokyo. What WDW has going for it is that it feels like the right destination for the family for right now even though it doesn't scratch my international travel itch. You also knock out 4 parks (instead of just two) and a whole lot of unique attractions for a lifelong Disneylander. Not to mention you can end your trip with a Disney cruise which sounds nice (and expensive).
Aren’t you at the parks right now? How’s your trip going?
That's the risk! I'm not sure if it helps to say there's no point in trying to do it all, because there are people who run WDW planning websites and have gone there for decades and still not done it all.Obviously it’s the vacation bubble aspect of WDW that really sets it apart and can’t be duplicated. Of course I wonder if my personality would even let me enjoy that part of it or If I’d be running from park to park trying to see and do as much as I can.
Yeah, Paris is like an extra-fancy, extra Tony Baxterified version of Disneyland (that hasn't built anything since 2005-not in a good way), and I'll bunk conventional wisdom and say that for me, not all of the alleged Super versions of the attractions hit the way I wanted them to. And if they're not unique to Paris they're pretty much DL clones. Plus you have an even worse 1st gate-2nd gate quality disparity than in California and awful food options that are neither particularly American nor particularly French. Paris is an amazing city, though.A part of me also wonders if I should do TDR or DLP before WDW. Prices are fairly comparable. I realized recently that outside of Sicily pretty much all my vacationing has taken place in Hawaii, Mexico, the Caribbean and Florida (never WDW). Multiple times to each. So I do have the urge to see new parts of the world and you can do worse than Paris or Tokyo. But of course the flights are not as short/ convenient as Florida. So that's not ideal with the kids.
As far as the parks, my issue with Paris, as much as I'd personally love to see that beautiful park is that I'm not sure how much the kids would get out of it considering all of their attractions are pretty much DL/ DCA the remix. Tokyo has a lot more to offer in that regard but outside of three days in the parks I'm not sure how much the kids would get out of Tokyo. What WDW has going for it is that it feels like the right destination for the family for right now even though it doesn't scratch my international travel itch. You also knock out 4 parks (instead of just two) and a whole lot of unique attractions for a lifelong Disneylander. Not to mention you can end your trip with a Disney cruise which sounds nice (and expensive).
Pretty well, all things considered. It's been busy, but not in a way that I can't work around.Aren’t you at the parks right now? How’s your trip going?
MK does have a few advantages besides just the castle. Tomorrowland being the biggest advantage with working peoplemover, proper astro orbitor, COP, TRON, and Sonny eclipse. Then they have some different versions of Winnie the pooh, jungle cruise, haunted mansion that provide enough different about them that makes them unique to enjoy. Also they still have shows CBJ and stuff like HOP as well. BTM and Buzz lightyear upgrades seem intriguing as well.Oh, it is-especially when it comes to the castle park.
But as much as I and many others rag on WDW, there are things they are better at than DLR, and I really do think that if you love these places, you should try, assuming the correct alignment of time/money/interest, to see them all. Every one of them has something that I feel makes it worth the journey-if not in isolation, then perhaps in combination with some other nearby attractions at the very least.
And WDW has two parks in Epcot and DAK that are unique and offer things that will never make it to any other park, and that doesn't even get into their hotel and restaurant game. The resort-first mentality of WDWers isn't something I will ever subscribe to, but in spite of many things I wouldn't do if I were in their shoes and other things I don't care for, the place does have legions of fans for a reason-and it's not just because East Coasters haven't found Disneyland yet.
It won't be for awhile yet, but I do look forward to the day that I get to experience Kilimanjaro Safaris, their excellent TOT, their chaotic-Matterhorn-in-the-dark version of Space Mountain, and wander World Showcase again-even as I snark about some of their other choices while I wander the parks.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.