Giss Neric
Well-Known Member
Except for the part where his meme is accurate and hers was asinine.
So you think pedophilia and rape is funny? Wow. Do you even know what he said? I suggest you look it up. It's really sick and disturbing. So much so that I dare not post it here.
what was the cost to having Gina in that role? Show me how the twitter mob had any effect on the profitability of her show? Was there a big drop in sales since the mob started tweeting? or drop in viewership? nawThere is not a double standard, you are just looking at the wrong metric.
Disney simply believes the cost is not worth the reward with Gina. It is when it comes to China.
what does she have to apologize for? Lets not pretend an apology would do any good for her anyway, we've been through this enough to know that is meaningless in these situations.When did Gina apologize for anything other than the Twitter bio incident like James Gunn did?
The simple fact that she is no longer employed by them shows whatever the cost, be it dollars, viewership, or just sick of dealing with the negative PR, it was too high.what was the cost to having Gina in that role? Show me how the twitter mob had any effect on the profitability of her show? Was there a big drop in sales since the mob started tweeting? or drop in viewership? naw
Except for the part where his meme is accurate and hers was asinine.
I read plenty. That’s fine, but a comparison using Nazis and Jews is the trigger point here. I’m not twisting anything.i dont think you even read the post that youre referring to.
“Gina Carano’s post made the point that mass violence starts with hatred for your neighbor, This is not only uncontroversially true but also one perspective of the commandment to love your neighbor. That idea is not a call to empty niceness. It’s how you prevent suffering.”
ya'll twisting the post to see what you want to see because ya want another reason to cancel her.
naw, it just shows they didnt like a republican tweeting while working for them. There was no cost.The simple fact that she is no longer employed by them shows whatever the cost, be it dollars, viewership, or just sick of dealing with the negative PR, it was too high.
nazi and jew comparisons are literally one of the most commonly used events for people to make points. godwins lawI read plenty. That’s fine, but a comparison using Nazis and Jews is the trigger point here. I’m not twisting anything.
It looks like you found your ultimate topic in this entire forum eh? You're all riled up about this topic.nazi and jew comparisons are literally one of the most commonly used events for people to make points. godwins law
Do you honestly think the people that make these decisions care one bit about her political affiliation or what she posted? She was not on brand and a PR hassle and not worth the trouble.naw, it just shows they didnt like a republican tweeting while working for them. There was no cost.
not really, people just keep replying to me so i reply back...It looks like you found your ultimate topic in this entire forum eh? You're all riled up about this topic.
Do you honestly think the people that make these decisions care one bit about her political affiliation or what she posted? She was not on brand and a PR hassle and not worth the trouble.
Had she been the lead character of a hit show, she would more than likely still have a job.
So you think... rape is funny? Wow.
So that makes it ok...alrighty then.nazi and jew comparisons are literally one of the most commonly used events for people to make points. godwins law
Except for the part where his meme is accurate and hers was asinine.
again there was no cost to having her on the show other than having to ignore twitter trolls. Disney ignores fan petitions/hashtags all the time. They get way more backlash for working with China than they do Gina. So your point is that because China makes them more money its ok to hold different standards.Do you honestly think the people that make these decisions care one bit about her political affiliation or what she posted? She was not on brand and a PR hassle and not worth the trouble.
Had she been the lead character of a hit show, she would more than likely still have a job.
umm yes, its actually ok to use historical events to make a point about not turning on your neighborsSo that makes it ok...alrighty then.
Yes, but context is important. People aren't turning on their neighbors, putting them into gas chambers and killing over a million of them just because of their religious beliefs. Find another comparison, there are plenty of other historical examples she could have used.again there was no cost to having her on the show other than having to ignore twitter trolls. Disney ignores fan petitions/hashtags all the time. They get way more backlash for working with China than they do Gina. So your point is that because China makes them more money its ok to hold different standards.
umm yes, its actually ok to use historical events to make a point about not turning on your neighbors
I didn't know the Chinese were so anti-Wookie.Disney is also conveniently forgetting that even though Gina Carano’s Holocaust comparison may have been objectionable, it’s kind of a nothing-burger compared to the overtly racist crap they’ve pulled to appease their Chinese overlords.
I never said it was OK. I said that is why they did it.again there was no cost to having her on the show other than having to ignore twitter trolls. Disney ignores fan petitions/hashtags all the time. They get way more backlash for working with China than they do Gina. So your point is that because China makes them more money its ok to hold different standards.
umm yes, its actually ok to use historical events to make a point about not turning on your neighbors
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.