Flippin'Flounder
Well-Known Member
Thank you, is he actually supposed to be a girl, or is he just played by one? (Like Peter Pan)The Broadway musical
Thank you, is he actually supposed to be a girl, or is he just played by one? (Like Peter Pan)The Broadway musical
What the...? I don't understand this trailer. It seems like the film will be very serious. The animated version has a lot of silliness to it, so I guess this film is taking a different approach. Am I misreading this?
They went extinct however before Jungle Book took place. The Orangutan is more believable.Okay, just found out the answer to the "why is King Louie huge" question... Apparently, since there aren't any orangutans in India (or at least there weren't when the movie takes place), they made him a Gigantopithecus.
Well I'm pretty sure they're not putting a child in a tigger, panthers, bears, constrictors, undead Giganpethicus way.Since most of the movie's characters are CGI, this seemed appropriate.
Didn't Walt make the people at Disney completley redo Jungle Book as it was too serious? Maybe this is the more serious version Walt wasn't a huge fan of?What the...? I don't understand this trailer. It seems like the film will be very serious. The animated version has a lot of silliness to it, so I guess this film is taking a different approach. Am I misreading this?
The more I listen to it the more unsettling it becomes. I would prefer something akin to what Kaa sounded like originally, but I guess its not possible?I'm not crazy about the voice-over of Scarlet Johansson for Kaa, it just sounds cheesy, not really scary. It doesn't really have that mesmerizing feel like in the original either.
Well I'm pretty sure they're not putting a child in a tigger, panthers, bears, constrictors, undead Giganpethicus way.
What the...? I don't understand this trailer. It seems like the film will be very serious. The animated version has a lot of silliness to it, so I guess this film is taking a different approach. Am I misreading this?
From the looks of the teaser, it seems you're right. I've never read The Jungle Book series, but I can assume the books weren't silly, like the Disney adaptation.
I've read them, and they're serious, all right. Kind of grim sometimes. That's why Disney artist Bill Peet's original storyboards for the "Jungle Book" movie were so dark and preachy, which is why Walt rejected them. I always questioned why Walt chose to stray SO far from the books, until I actually saw Peet's story treatments on a "Jungle Book" DVD extra...and yeah, then I could see Walt's reasoning. Peet's version was downright dull. "The Jungle Book" is not one of my favorite Disney films, but I guess I can understand why Walt did what he did. He preferred to entertain, rather than preach to people about man's inhumanity to animals and so forth.
As for this new film, It looks like a total live-action remake of the animated film, which seems kind of pointless. Oh, and by the way, there was no King Louie, or even an orangutan, in the actual Jungle Books. And Kaa was a good guy.
And Kaa was a good guy.
The idea in general of having Kaa as a girl sounds weird to me... It worked for Rafiki, but Kaa? I don't know...
Could be a bait-and-switch.
Disney frequently cuts a trailer to make a movie look like something it's not.
Witness the "Tangled" trailers that all hid the fact that the movie was a musical.
WHAT!!?? That's not possible...Disney has never taken a film and marketed it with a completely different tone. Especially with a tone that is nothing like the actual film. The trailers I have seen ALWAYS properly convey the tone and in NO WAY are used as bait-and-switch marketing ploys....
But what do I know, I'm just a Marvel hater after all
I don't get it- how was that a bait-and-switch trailer?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.