Shouldigo12
Well-Known Member
Well....yeah. Should they be wanting people to spend less?The big clue is they seem proud that the amount spent per guest is up.
Well....yeah. Should they be wanting people to spend less?The big clue is they seem proud that the amount spent per guest is up.
And I suppose they are unpaid?
What does this mean? The parks are overcrowded and the rides are only half full?I gotta ask when are you there when rides are at 50% capacity?
Perhaps someone can help me- I had heard that so many of land was set aside for conservation- I thought Walt had set up land for animal conservation. Is this true?They have not been enlarging the parks. That’s the problem. Another under built gate and all of its associated expenses won’t fix the fundamental problems with Disney’s view of theme parks and Walt Disney World.
I suppose they would be using college kids for these moves hu?I'm not sure how it works in Florida, but when I used to work hourly, they had to pay us for a minimum of 3 hours even if they sent us home in 30mins.
Yes. The large majority is in Osceola County south of the developed property. South of I-4Perhaps someone can help me- I had heard that so many of land was set aside for conservation- I thought Walt had set up land for animal conservation. Is this true?
It means there are times when ride waits are - you might say - inflated- because only one half of say, BTMRR is running.What does this mean? The parks are overcrowded and the rides are only half full?
Yes, land is set aside for conservation and there are minimums required by law. Some of it is at Walt Disney World and there are also parcels located elsewhere. That though does not impact Walt Disney World’s ability to increase capacity in the existing parks or even build additional gates. Conservation lands are not held in trust or deed restricted, so they can be swapped with other land, something that occurred relatively recently. It is not a cause for Walt Disney World’s capacity issues.Perhaps someone can help me- I had heard that so many of land was set aside for conservation- I thought Walt had set up land for animal conservation. Is this true?
Thank you. I can't recall where I heard it, so I wasn't sure if it were true or not.Yes, land is set aside for conservation and there are minimums required by law. Some of it is at Walt Disney World and there are also parcels located elsewhere. That though does not impact Walt Disney World’s ability to increase capacity in the existing parks or even build additional gates. Conservation lands are not held in trust or deed restricted, so they can be swapped with other land, something that occurred relatively recently. It is not a cause for Walt Disney World’s capacity issues.
Clearly you should have researched the ferryboat party dates, cross referenced those with the refurbishment schedule and then been more responsible for yourself and left before the people leaving before the fireworks.I just wanted to add another example of what the OP started with. Just last night, we wanted to leave before the fireworks at MK. The problem was that we didn't want to take the monorail due to its track record with us recently. To avoid the risk, we first went over to the bus loading area and asked if there were any buses going to the TTC. We were told that there were not until AFTER the fireworks, so we had to take the other alternative: the ferry. Once we reached the line it turned out the boat had just left, but that's fine because there is another boat coming our way, right? No. They only had one boat running, causing us to wait there a good thirty minutes.
Once we loaded and were about halfway there, we saw what had happened to the other boat. It was parked to the side with a group of people on it with blue-lighted necklaces. We found out later that it was the Fairytale Fireworks up-charge dessert party. But we knew this was no excuse because there are three ferry boats. After we unloaded from the boat, there was a manager in front of the gate to the ferry. We asked him what happened to the third boat and he told us it was being refurbished. Let's summarize: if you want to leave BEFORE the fireworks your options are an unreliable monorail or a single ferry boat.
Thank you for the interesting fact about the Southern Seas II. As I didn't visit WDW very often between 1995 and 2001, I must have missed that. It really would have been handy last night!Clearly you should have researched the ferryboat party dates, cross referenced those with the refurbishment schedule and then been more responsible for yourself and left before the people leaving before the fireworks.
On a serious note, this is another example of less capacity existing today. Southern Seas II, which was pretty much a dedicated special event vessel, was destroyed in 1997 without replacement.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.