The Curious Constance Clan's 2017 Trip to the Disneyland Resort.

Professortango1

Well-Known Member
Wow! Never ceases to amaze me how people on the Internet can never graciously admit being in error.
Almost all the words you list are not vulgar according to the dictionary. Go ahead and look them up.
Vulgar is coarse language and often refers to body parts. When a word is used in a figurative or metaphorical sense, it can still be vulgar. Your implicit argument that figurative language can't be vulgar is wrong, and bizarre.
Slang is informal language.

My apologies to Constance for distracting from your awesomely cool trip report. This is my last word on the subject. :angelic:

I never said figurative language can't be vulgar. Freaking is a euphemism for fornication. I think most people would constitute heightened discussion of fornication as vulgar.

All I'm saying is that freaking and pi$$ing are both "uncouth," but fairly acceptable in modern day American families. Calling pi$$ing a curse word in today's time is extreme, just as calling someone lame or dumb isn't an ablelist remark despite its roots. The English language changes, so saying pi$$ing is a curse word because Webster only defines is as a vulgar term for urination is misrepresenting the modern word. I mean, nobody reacts in horror is somebody refers to another as a scumbag, even though the word literally means a used condom.
 
D

Deleted member 107043

Most of Universal pretty much reflects everything that's loud, crass, and vulgar about current pop culture. With the exception of Hogsmeade, it's not for me. It would take an exceptionally well-done Super Nintendo World to get me to return.

It's ironic that the most popular addition ever at a park known for crassness is based on Harry Potter, a theme that could have easily been adopted for a Disney park.
 

yookeroo

Well-Known Member
Agreed, but in retrospect, and with the subsequent Marvel and LucasFilm purchases, Universal needed the boost more than Disney did. If Disney is going to focus on IP it might as well use properties that it controls.

One of the good things about Uni getting Potter is that it gave Disney a bit of competition. Universal still really isn't a big threat to Disney, but I do think they've pushed Disney to up their game.
 

GiveMeTheMusic

Well-Known Member
I was so bummed when Universal got the Potter license instead of Disney.

It's no one's fault but Disney's. WB/Rowling went to them first and expected it to be an easy match. Rasulo resisted it and WDI's astonishing proposal for the IP was Midway Mania with wands and walkthrough petting zoo of magical creatures. WB/Rowling were, to put it politely, underwhelmed.
 

Professortango1

Well-Known Member
I was so bummed when Universal got the Potter license instead of Disney.

I was too. But considering both Harry Potter lands surpass anything Disney has created before or since, I think we would have something a lot more "corporate" feeling than the immersive lands Universal gave us. I mean, look at the level of detail and design in New Fantasyland vs Hogsmede. We made the mistake of eating at Be Our Guest after Universal and it just didn't compare.
 
D

Deleted member 107043

One of the good things about Uni getting Potter is that it gave Disney a bit of competition. Universal still really isn't a big threat to Disney, but I do think they've pushed Disney to up their game.

Yep, that too.
 

Professortango1

Well-Known Member
I've never been, but I'm skeptical that WWoHP will never live up to this kind of hype when I finally do go there.

I can definitely understand that. I will say that I'm a life long Disney fan and never really been a huge fan of Potter, but I was in love with all of the details and interactive elements. It really felt like I was someplace outside of a theme park.
 

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I was kind of surprised how right out in the open it is. Turn right at Shrek and it's right there. No hiding it or winding paths to get to it or anything. I think Disney would have done that better.

That said, the details in the land are really outstanding. Visually, it's amazing. I don't think there is enough substance behind the visuals to go crazy over it though. The ride was fun for me, but nothing I can't wait to do again. The coaster is really, really lame. I'd rather it not be there at all, to be honest with you. It's not worth any wait time at all. It felt like it was about 10 seconds long.
 
D

Deleted member 107043

I was kind of surprised how right out in the open it is. Turn right at Shrek and it's right there. No hiding it or winding paths to get to it or anything. I think Disney would have done that better.

That said, the details in the land are really outstanding. Visually, it's amazing. I don't think there is enough substance behind the visuals to go crazy over it though. The ride was fun for me, but nothing I can't wait to do again. The coaster is really, really lame. I'd rather it not be there at all, to be honest with you. It's not worth any wait time at all. It felt like it was about 10 seconds long.

This expresses exactly what I expect it to be. Pretty to look at, but short on substance.
 
D

Deleted member 107043

You know I've read and re-read this thread and nowhere did I see you talk about Disneyland's newest attraction, the fabulous Tomorrowland Skyline Lounge. You disappoint me. What happened?
 

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
You know I've read and re-read this thread and nowhere did I see you talk about Disneyland's newest attraction, the fabulous Tomorrowland Skyline Lounge. You disappoint me. What happened?
Hahaha my wallet went into cardiac shock because it was losing so much money. Evan swears he saw Darth Vader in a light saber battle up there one evening so maybe they have him entertaining guests now.
 
D

Deleted member 107043

Hahaha my wallet went into cardiac shock because it was losing so much money. Evan swears he saw Darth Vader in a light saber battle up there one evening so maybe they have him entertaining guests now.

He was just trying to get you to shell out more money. :D
 

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
This expresses exactly what I expect it to be. Pretty to look at, but short on substance.

Forbidden Journey is fun, don't get me wrong, but I was a bit let down. The queue though is amazing. I've been a Harry Potter fan for years, so it was kind of a dream come true going through that castle lol

The restaurant is really well done too. Food was pretty good. Seemed expensive to me though. But everything at Universal seemed expensive to me. I understand theme parks are expensive as is most things these days, but Universal seemed especially so.

Shops were also too small. They weren't that crowded but you still couldn't move much.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom