capecodhome
Member
I am hoping with the extra tax money the goverment is giving to us to put back in the economy, I will put money down for a vacation in 2009 :sohappy:.
What big check at the end of the year that pays for Christmas?:shrug:
They get that before Christmas? :veryconfuThe big check that people get who don't adjust their withholdings properly, thus giving the government the aforementioned "interest-free loan".....
They get that before Christmas? :veryconfu
:brick::brick:No, I assumed it meant that the Christmas gifts were on a credit card, then when the tax refund came, it paid for Christmas. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
for everyone using this money (if & when approved) be careful. all it is, is a early rebate of your money you would get back at the end of the year. so if you expect to get that big check at the end of the year to pay for xmas gifts it wont be there. happened to me a few years ago when we got the 600 back during the summer....just a heads up incase someone did not know that
No it's not. This is different than 2001ish when there was an "advance rebate". This has specifically declared non-taxable by the US gov(states have not specified but its doubtful that they will)
No, I assumed it meant that the Christmas gifts were on a credit card, then when the tax refund came, it paid for Christmas. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
For those who wait in baited breath for their tax refund from the government every spring, the objective should be to not even get a refund. If you adjust your witholding from your paycheck correctly, you will get this money during the course of the year as extra income in your pay. Do not give the govt an interest free loan.
:lookaroun:lol:
Do people normally charge Christmas on a card? Dangerous habit!
The 2001 rebate was simply an advance refund of what are typically overpaid withholdings. The actual tax rates and tables were unchanged, so your total tax liability for the year was the same as it would have been without the rebate...as such, you owed $600 more at the end of the year or got back $600 less than you would have otherwise.
Sorry - but you are completely wrong. There WAS a change in the tax tables in 2001 - the 15% bracket was lowered to 10% - and presuming an individual made enough to hit that bracket, their tax liability was reduced as well. This is what the 2001 rebate addressed - essentially the rebate was refunding that extra 5% to you.
Mechanics for the 2008 rebate are similiar.
You may be right about the 2001 rebate but this rebate is much different. As mentioned before, it is not taxable and it will not be deducted from your tax refund for next year.
This bill will also not change the tax tables at all.
The plan to fund the agreement between Bush and the House is to drop the 10% bracket for 2008, with a few exclusions. I haven't had time to read the full bill text, so I don't know if both the rebate and tax cut are covered in a single bill, or if a second bill needs to be introduced to cover the tax cut. But that is the plan.
Of course, what actually gets hammered out in agreement with the Senate could change that exact plan somewhat.
But there absolutely will be a tax cut somewhere to cover the rebate. It's just a matter of where, and how much.
UPDATE: Full text of the bill is available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c110:1:./temp/~c110knexW7:e473:
If my read of it is correct, the bill includes language to treat the rebate as a "credit" paid towards each qualifying individuals tax liability for 2008 as opposed to passing a tax rate cut. So that means if you earn a, and according to the tax tables that means you owe b, and your rebate is c, next year when you fill out your taxes the tax owed will be b-c instead of b.
Honey? Is that you? :lookaroun
:lol:
You sound exactly like my DH...... whenever he hears someone bragging about their 10K tax refund, he cringes... :brick:
Just to confirm TT's point. The 2001 rebate was simply an advance refund of what are typically overpaid withholdings. The actual tax rates and tables were unchanged, so your total tax liability for the year was the same as it would have been without the rebate...as such, you owed $600 more at the end of the year or got back $600 less than you would have otherwise.
The stimulus package kicking around Washington now actually reduces everybody's tax bill for the year by the amount of the "rebate" check that will be sent.
Sorry - but you are completely wrong. There WAS a change in the tax tables in 2001 - the 15% bracket was lowered to 10% - and presuming an individual made enough to hit that bracket, their tax liability was reduced as well. This is what the 2001 rebate addressed - essentially the rebate was refunding that extra 5% to you.
Mechanics for the 2008 rebate are similiar.
You may be right about the 2001 rebate but this rebate is much different. As mentioned before, it is not taxable and it will not be deducted from your tax refund for next year.
This bill will also not change the tax tables at all.
Wow! I am not often thorough enough to be COMPLETELY wrong about anything. Nonetheless, I am now confused enough that I have to say I don't know how it'll work this time around, so ignore my earlier comments.
I wish I could receive a check...i make just barely above the salary cut off..sucks...middle class gets screwed again.
Read my previous post with the actual bill text. There is no mention of a change of income taxes nor does it say this is an advanced refund of next years taxes.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.