Andrew C
You know what's funny?
Don’t get mad at me if you hate it! It’s one of those poor performers with a weird following.Just checked - YES. I will watch it and check back
Don’t get mad at me if you hate it! It’s one of those poor performers with a weird following.Just checked - YES. I will watch it and check back
No worries, it's on D+ its effectively free and is exactly why folks do not go to the movies. If I can wait a little and watch it on streaming I willDon’t get mad at me if you hate it! It’s one of those poor performers with a weird following.
I like this one from American Dog (Bolt)That just scratches the surface. There's a wonderful book about Pixar history called "Creativity Inc.", you can find it on internet archive if youre unable to find it anywhere else. According to that book, the reason the movie had to be reworked was due to one of the main characters, specifically a serial killer mutant zombie girl scout. Sheesh.
That being said, I do love the concept art from American Dog. I have one of the pieces as my current pfp
Yes. It's on D+. That one is actually pretty good.I never saw Prince of Persia. Is it on D+ ?
This is why I have mixed feelings about it. The concept art is so good, the concept seems more fun than Bolt too. But there's a lot of things that are too weird about the story. Not sure if we lost something great for something generic or if we gained something good from a messy concept.I like this one from American Dog (Bolt)
According to screenrant last year, Rocky Horror has grossed over $120M during its continual theatrical run.Agreed. Regardless of the artistic merits of the film, flops like this seem to butt up against a unique set of financial and cultural physics when it comes to recovering after a disastrous opening.
I always wonder what the financial impact of becoming a cult hit long after the theatrical run is for a studio?
Rocky Horror Picture Show was a total bomb in its theatrical run around the Bicentennial as I remember. But several years later it became a cult classic by doing Midnight showings in big cities where fans would dress up as their favorite character and act scenes out in the theater aisles. By the 1980's it was a regular Saturday night offering in every college town in America; dress up and go see Rocky Horror Picture Show at Midnight (usually under the influence).
But did 20th Century Fox get any real money for those showings years after it bombed in the theater? I can't imagine they did, so long after its release and after they shared the profits with the theater houses doing the Midnight showings.
It is well worth a watch. It's my favorite video game movie, very underrated. It's too bad it performed so poorly as the 2nd and 3rd games would have been great to adapt. They were darker stories and would have translated well to a movie.I never saw Prince of Persia. Is it on D+ ?
Yes. Even if the profits are split, Rocky Horror Picture show has sold 55 million tickets domestically and has grossed $112 million (worth $516 million if you adjust for inflation). It also became popular in the DVD era, especially during October.But did 20th Century Fox get any real money for those showings years after it bombed in the theater? I can't imagine they did, so long after its release and after they shared the profits with the theater houses doing the Midnight showings.
I'm curious what the production budget is. I did a quick google search but couldn't find any hard numbers.Reviews are coming in for "Puss n' Boots"
View attachment 682270
Which is strange, is it out yet?
EDIT: There's comments on reddit of people seeing it. So it is out early somewhere
EDIT 2: Early screenings confirmed
Oh no, with these glowing reviews for Puss in Boots James Cameron must be quite nervous! How can Avatar: The Way of Water compete!?!Reviews are coming in for "Puss n' Boots"
View attachment 682270
Which is strange, is it out yet?
EDIT: There's comments on reddit of people seeing it. So it is out early somewhere
EDIT 2: Early screenings confirmed
Submarine man goes brrrrrrrrOh no, with these glowing reviews for Puss in Boots James Cameron must be quite nervous! How can Avatar: The Way of Water compete!?!
I think Disney probably wanted to have female characters in the movie for marketing/representation reasons but couldn't really decide what to do with them. Meridian could have been better developed as a character.The mother is a nonentity for the emotional storyline, she has only the briefest interaction with Jaegar, and then she disappears for the final scene. Why is she even there? Rhetorical question. Having her risk her life to fly to the ship to inform Searcher their son has stowed away doesn’t make a lot of story sense. Happily ever after ending isn’t very satisfying or convincing, but I think that’s true of a lot of modern Disney.
I've been saddened over the past few years that Disney/Pixar has gone this route with all the other animation studios. If they casted known actors previously, it was usually because the voice quality added something unique to the character. Think Monsters Inc or Wreck-It Ralph, for example, with their near-perfect voice castings. Now compare that, for example, to the generic, insert-the-celebrity performances of Tina Fey in Soul or Tom Holland and Chris Evans in Onward.Not sure Gyllenhaal was right for the lead, but either way, why’s Disney bother to pay premium for recognizable actors to do voice work like this? Surely that’s one area they could cut expenses. On the positive side, the serial-style wipes and irises are a nice touch, and the flat pulp comic book visuals used in the intro were striking. Wish the whole film had committed to that level of stylization.
That was Chris Pratt.I've been saddened over the past few years that Disney/Pixar has gone this route with all the other animation studios. If they casted known actors previously, it was usually because the voice quality added something unique to the character. Think Monsters Inc or Wreck-It Ralph, for example, with their near-perfect voice castings. Now compare that, for example, to the generic, insert-the-celebrity performances of Tina Fey in Soul or Tom Holland and Chris Evans in Onward.
I thought Tina Fey was very good in Soul, and I don’t like Tina Fey much.I've been saddened over the past few years that Disney/Pixar has gone this route with all the other animation studios. If they casted known actors previously, it was usually because the voice quality added something unique to the character. Think Monsters Inc or Wreck-It Ralph, for example, with their near-perfect voice castings. Now compare that, for example, to the generic, insert-the-celebrity performances of Tina Fey in Soul or Tom Holland and Chris Evans in Onward.
Phil Harris!If they casted known actors previously, it was usually because the voice quality added something unique to the character. Think Monsters Inc or Wreck-It Ralph, for example, with their near-perfect voice castings. Now compare that, for example, to the generic, insert-the-celebrity performances of Tina Fey in Soul or Tom Holland and Chris Evans in Onward.
When you cast big name actors in voice roles, you get big name actors doing the PR circuit to promote your film. That’s a big payoff for relatively little investment.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.