999th Happy Haunt
Well-Known Member
Why? How would that improve the park by taking away a ride?There are very few attractions whose removal I think would improve a park, but Kali is one of them
Why? How would that improve the park by taking away a ride?There are very few attractions whose removal I think would improve a park, but Kali is one of them
Addition by subtraction is only guaranteed to decrease capacity. It is more than capable at improving cohesion with a land, uniting attractions thematically, and strengthening the theme of a park.Why? How would that improve the park by taking away a ride?
Addition by subtraction is only guaranteed to decrease capacity. It is more than capable at improving cohesion with a land, uniting attractions thematically, and strengthening the theme of a park.
Exactly...take the existing ride and expand it into more of a journey...Longer ride, more interesting settings, and maybe back off on the total drenching and it would be great...With the thematics of a jungle temple trek there is so much that could be done to make this the most amazing attraction in the park..Kali already fits well and has nice theming but it needs to be longer like grizzly river run.
Also it needs to get people more soaked, I was so disappointed by that rideExactly...take the existing ride and expand it into more of a journey...Longer ride, more interesting settings, and maybe back off on the total drenching and it would be great...With the thematics of a jungle temple trek there is so much that could be done to make this the most amazing attraction in the park..
What was the decision? I must have missed that oneNow that they've made a decision on U.K. have they come to their senses here?
it has not been announced, only been confirmed by @marni1971 that a final decision on UK has been madeWhat was the decision? I must have missed that one
What is it?it has not been announced, only been confirmed by @marni1971 that a final decision on UK has been made
Martin said that he can’t say at the moment, and he said that he is pleased with the decision and that it’s a Disney IP. When he is able to tell more, he will. Until then all we can do is guess and respect his decision.What is it?
So it's a ride?Martin said that he can’t say at the moment, and he said that he is pleased with the decision and that it’s a Disney IP. When he is able to tell more, he will. Until then all we can do is guess and respect his decision.
Or is it a show...?So it's a ride?
If I remember correctly, it’s a C- ticket attraction (Something along the lines of Gran Fiesta Tour)Or is it a show...?
If I remember correctly, it’s a C- ticket attraction (Something along the lines of Gran Fiesta Tour)
mysterious...Or is it a show...?
I know the FEA argument, but wouldn't Mary Poppins better compliment the existing aesthetic of the U.K. pavilion more than Alice in (Fantasyland)/Wonderland would?Gotta be AIW...right? Seems like it would make the most sense and be the easiest one to do. Or possibly Mary Poppins. But I feel like Alice is more popular and is more visually impressive and the world more interesting for a dark ride.
I know the FEA argument, but wouldn't Mary Poppins better compliment the existing aesthetic of the U.K. pavilion more than Alice in (Fantasyland)/Wonderland would?
Plus with that sequel coming out, it'd be more current.I know the FEA argument, but wouldn't Mary Poppins better compliment the existing aesthetic of the U.K. pavilion more than Alice in (Fantasyland)/Wonderland would?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.