-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge - Historical Construction/Impressions
- Thread starter BrianLo
- Start date
Disney Irish
Premium Member
They already have a cult fan favorite, several of them, but they choose the whiney, baby who wears a helmet with a voice changer, not out of medical nesessity, but so people actually don't point and laugh at what a terrible villain he really is. Oh, well, at least it'll help ink out every last cent from the new movie, since that's what's really important to Disney these days. It's certainly not about making the best attractions, with the most iconic, well loved characters.
Cult fans are cult fans for a reason. There doesn't have to be logic to it.
I personally didn't think Kylo was that bad as a character. It showed a troubled kid with lots of inner turmoil of trying to live in the shadow of his great military and political parents, his Jedi uncle, and an evil Sith grandfather. In some ways you almost want to root for him, in other ways you feel sorry for him. Bottom line its a character that will grow into cult fan favorite over time.
THE 1HAPPY HAUNT
Well-Known Member
one thing that just stands out as just flat out wrong about this resisstance ride to me is why would the first order even have AT-ATs on board a star destroyer and why would they allow a non precision vehicle to fire in the star destroyer possibly destroying their own ship for some escaped prisoners in a slow moving rv??? Disney wants it in there because "it's a star wars ride we need AT-ATs, AT-ATs" but logically it makes no sense for that vehicle to be in there let alone start firing around the room. just one of the things Disney did not think about logically like not having us walk on the physical falcon outside the que for the smuggler's run ride.
Last edited:
mickEblu
Well-Known Member
Oh no.
THE 1HAPPY HAUNT
Well-Known Member
'OOOOH YEAH!"-Kool Aid Man
mickEblu
Well-Known Member
Lol I’m just saying be prepared for 5 pages of rebuttals
britain
Well-Known Member
Anyway, was this article run through a Google translator or something?
The two buddy vehicles may get a call from the Resistance ships to find an escape pod. The hacked vehicles will add the coordinates and take off. They almost make it before meeting up with Kylo Ren one last time. He uses the force to hold up the room as he comes at you, but at the last second, a wall collapses which causes him to focus all his attention on not getting hit.
The two buddy vehicles may get a call from the Resistance ships to find an escape pod. The hacked vehicles will add the coordinates and take off. They almost make it before meeting up with Kylo Ren one last time. He uses the force to hold up the room as he comes at you, but at the last second, a wall collapses which causes him to focus all his attention on not getting hit.
THE 1HAPPY HAUNT
Well-Known Member
Just 2 because I am going to subvert your expectations like that hack fraud Rian Johnson
I don't know what they'll do with Kylo in Ep 9. He's run out of father figures to kill.
Disney Irish
Premium Member
Chewie?
TROR
Well-Known Member
I'm hoping Rey decapitates him and then her and Poe make out over his headless corpse.
Curious Constance
Well-Known Member
He’s gonna kill mama.
Curious Constance
Well-Known Member
Didn’t anyone ever tell Kylo that Darth Vader turned good in the end? He’s always praying to him to help him stay away from the light, but his grandfather be like 
britain
Well-Known Member
Didn’t anyone ever tell Kylo that Darth Vader turned good in the end? He’s always praying to him to help him stay away from the light, but his grandfather be like
He's praying to Darth Vader, not Anakin Skywalker.
Disney Irish
Premium Member
Star Destroyers did carry a small group of AT-ATs and had a drop ship (Theta class AT-AT barge) specifically designed to deploy a single AT-AT as needed.
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Theta-class_AT-AT_barge
So its not Disney just doing to because they want to, although they could because well they own it, but its actually canon.
As for the firing within the ship, how many of the SW movies have we seen where there is firing inside a ship. Um, like all of them, long before Disney ever owned Lucas.
THE 1HAPPY HAUNT
Well-Known Member
no AT-AT ever fired in a ship in the original trilogy because not even Lucas is that stupid. and all I know is the OT never showed AT-ATs or TIE FIGHTERS being stored in in a star destroyer. now one would assume for the battle of hoth they got down to the planet by some sort of transport ship that must has stored them because a star destroyer can't enter a planet's atmosphere, but again Disney even managed to mess that up in ROGUE ONE when they showed a start destroyer in orbit. gee if the empire could bring a star destroyer into orbit with all it's fire power that would have been a better weapon to use on the hoth base than a slow moving , non precision, vehicle that is used just to scorch the earth around it. Disney does not understand STAR WARS nor will it ever.
Last edited:
Curious Constance
Well-Known Member
Old Mouseketeer
Well-Known Member
The schizophrenic is strong in this family.
Disney Irish
Premium Member
Well I never said that AT-AT cannons were fired. But almost every other weapon has been fired on the ships by the inept Storm Troopers. So its not a far stretch to think they'd fire AT-AT cannons too.
I get that there is a large portion of the SW fandom that doesn't like what Disney has done with the SW films. But this particular idea that AT-ATs can't be on a Star Destroyer is ridiculous as its been in canon long before Disney ever bought Lucas.
I'm not even going to get into your other points about the Star Destroyers because it too is also just ridiculous.