Casper Gutman
Well-Known Member
This is dead on.Different people have different opinions about the quality of the movies. Regardless, the movies didn't have to affect the quality of the park itself. Yet somehow Disney managed to
- made a park without any of the most popular characters
- made a park without ANY characters or interaction, really (you're expecting to see aliens in the Star Wars land, right? Or talk to droids? Not gonna happen!)
- made a park without much to do for children (the lightsaber experience at the hotel is obviously an attraction for kids and maybe some adults who didn't want to go to Savi's, not something really immersive)
- made a park in which these theme park experiences that are basic to every other Disney park were gatekept within a hotel that costs $2.5k a night!
Oh, and don't forget that lots of the good experiences (Savi's, Oga's, Rise until a few months ago) involve upcharges, have to be scheduled months in advance, or are part of a reservation system that involves referencing the ATOMIC CLOCK.
People are mad because they're going through all the stress and expense of a boutique experience to get a final product that's Six Flags quality. And that's not Kennedy, that's all Bob Chapek.
And Rise still involves two of the impediments you describe - you need to use a very accurate clock AND pay an upcharge.
If Disney was so intent on canonical integrity, instead of having one side of the land be First Order and the other Resistance, one could have been OT and one ST. Or they could have done the even more logical thing and built multiple lands, ala Uni and Potter - how about Endor in the AK, with a big emphasis on all the great creatures in Star Wars, which are almost totally absent from Batuu? Naboo in the MK? I’d pay.