SPOILERS: Snow White live action (March 21, 2025 release)

MarvelCharacterNerd

Well-Known Member
I like this one review quote, "If the Gremlins where watching the new Snow White, they would have walked out into the sunlight."


My favorite review quote was: "It's hard not to see this as anything other than a crisis point for Disney, a studio that used to make flawless cinematic stories but now infantilises global audiences with sanctimonious life lessons culled from the corpses of their own murdered movies".
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
My favorite review quote was: "It's hard not to see this as anything other than a crisis point for Disney, a studio that used to make flawless cinematic stories but now infantilises global audiences with sanctimonious life lessons culled from the corpses of their own murdered movies".
Disney — going back to the Walt era — has always had its share of crappy live action movies. They just tend to be forgotten by time, with only the good ones being passed on as classics.

Snow White 2025 will probably be completely forgotten 10-15 years from now, but there's nothing really uniquely awful about it. Like I said, it's a perfectly average 6/10 movie.
 

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
Disney — going back to the Walt era — has always had its share of crappy live action movies. They just tend to be forgotten by time, with only the good ones being passed on as classics.

Snow White 2025 will probably be completely forgotten 10-15 years from now, but there's nothing really uniquely awful about it. Like I said, it's a perfectly average 6/10 movie.
Except the Disney live action movies tended to be cheap programmers (notable exception for 20K Leagues), and they were kept detached from the crown jewel animation features. Neither of those things is true of Disney’s current live action slate.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
I thought it was fine. I really like Zegler in the role (but I’m a crazy person who liked her in Hunger Games and Romeo + Juliet on Broadway). For me, the weakest link was Gadot. I don’t mind the flat delivery as the Evil Queen was always pretty stoic. I just don’t think she acts well. I did love her costumes and nails, though!

The dwarfs were…fine. But the fact that there just happen to be 7 bandits leads me to believe they were originally the “dwarfs” but audiences balked in early screenings.

To whomever mentioned it, Zegler can actually sing. She sang live on Broadway.

The biggest improvement for me over the original was adding some depth to the Prince in Jonathan. Even if he’s basically Flynn Rider. And thank goodness the world’s boys finally know you don’t kiss a dead girl unless she expressed wanting to kiss you while alive. You don’t just give it all away to any dead girl. Only dead girls who are The One.

Of the new songs, I thought “Waiting on a Wish” was really pretty. All of the others were forgettable. No real surprise, since that’s the one song they were pushing. Kinda like the Wish song in Wish.
 
Last edited:

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
And thank goodness the world’s boys finally know you don’t kiss a dead girl unless she expressed wanting to kiss you while alive. You don’t just give it all away to any dead girl. Only dead girls who are The One.
I didn't realize this was a problem in reality.

What if girl kisses a dead boy?
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
I didn't realize this was a problem in reality.

What if girl kisses a dead boy?

They ABSOLUTELY spent hours discussing how they’d make it clear she wants to be kissed and then discussing whether the true-love’s-kiss would also be their first kiss.

That’s actually part of the issue here. Watching the film, it’s clear there was a vision but the movie was then hacked up by committees to fix contradictory problems. At the end of the day, it is really hard to remake an old movie. Change nothing and people are offended. Change too much and the fans are upset. Exhibit A: how do we portray dwarfs? Someone was dealt a bad hand on that and did the best they could. At least they made Dopey more endearing. And, credit where due—they make it clear that Snow White is attracted to Jonathan in particular. In the original, any prince will do. Simple storylines are fine but the story itself shows that maybe we shouldn’t marry just anyone with the desired chromosomes.

This film probably should have joined Peter Pan and Wendy and gone direct to Disney+. Let Stitch make the big bucks in theaters.
 
Last edited:

Sirwalterraleigh

Well-Known Member
Any money spent on ads going forward is an absolute waste…

It’s a complete flop. Case closed

And this part is interesting…it’s not a “political” response…it’s just not at all interesting


So don’t buy the already popping up articles saying it’s a “liberal Hollywood failure”…the demographics aren’t really supporting it.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Well-Known Member
Why would ads already bought and paid for be pulled, that is just a waste and not logical at all. It’s not like you can get a refund on that.

Now I could see maybe not doing large scale future ad buys. But pulling ads already paid for, nah that ain’t happening.
I’m sure what is contractually already locked is sunk money…but there’s always options to increase the duration they’re run or in the modern world: the frequency on web and stream
 

JAN J

Active Member
2017 Beauty and the Beast for me was exactly how you do a live action adaptation. I'm not sure why they feel the need to change a formula that worked. It did $170 million opening weekend, $350 million globally and 1.2 billion in total box office.
Aladdin was my favorite but yes, same point, not sure why they would change a winning formula.
 


Write your reply...

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom