• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

SPOILERS: Snow White live action (March 21, 2025 release)

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
I thought your point was that these films are “coming out crappy” in part because they avoid love stories. So I’m not sure how my saying that the love story is actually central to Snow White strengthens that point.

As I said last night these movies are coming out crappy because priorities are wrong. Things like Disney watering down love stories that are central to their classic films is just a byproduct of that.
 

Farerb

Well-Known Member
Im basing this off the last 10 or so years of Disney movies movies + Zeglers comments.
To be fair all the remakes retain the romantic relationships from the originals, it's expected of them.

I didn't care for the new guy and I didn't care that they turned him into a nobody, mostly because it was obvious they did it so Snow White would end up as the only "ruler" or "leader" or whatever. I also thought he was extremely bland. I much prefer the Prince from the original film.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
I thought your point was that these films are “coming out crappy” in part because they avoid love stories. So I’m not sure how my saying that the love story is actually central to Snow White strengthens that point.

Because people won’t even give it a chance because they don’t think they re going to like what they see based off Disneys recent movies and Zeglers comments. So it doesn’t even matter if they actually pulled it off this time.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
Oh yeah, I figured that's what you meant. I'm just curious if a general majority check that (like, do they check the Rotten Tomato scores to determine their expectations), or if it's just not really a factor.

And unless the previews capture things very differently from the actual movie, it's just not really different for me. The ones that I seem to enjoy are the ones that go from a different perspective (ala Wicked or Maleficent). Even retold, I'm just bored of similar stories. And I know it's been discussed elsewhere, but I just don't give the benefit of the doubt on films (especially when I am going to be shelling out a good deal of money for them nowadays). Lastly, I'm really over the remakes, so I just refuse to go to them at this point. Lilo and Stich has everyone (including my kids) SUPER excited, but I will absolutely not go see it out of principle. One ticket I'm sure makes no difference, but I'm standing by it.
Fair enough! Do you watch them when they move to Disney+?
 

Chi84

Premium Member
To be fair all the remakes retain the romantic relationships from the originals, it's expected of them.

I didn't care for the new guy and I didn't care that they turned him into a nobody, mostly because it was obvious they did it so Snow White would end up as the only "ruler" or "leader" or whatever. I also thought he was extremely bland. I much prefer the Prince from the original film.
What was it about the Prince from the original film that made him preferable?
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
To be fair all the remakes retain the romantic relationships from the originals, it's expected of them.

I didn't care for the new guy and I didn't care that they turned him into a nobody, mostly because it was obvious they did it so Snow White would end up as the only "ruler" or "leader" or whatever. I also thought he was extremely bland. I much prefer the Prince from the original film.
I get not liking the character of Jonathan, but I’m puzzled you would consider him blander that the original prince, who receives very little screen time and whose character isn’t developed at all. (That’s not a criticism of him.)
 

Farerb

Well-Known Member
What was it about the Prince from the original film that made him preferable?

I get not liking the character of Jonathan, but I’m puzzled you would consider him more bland that the original prince, who receives very little screen time and whose character isn’t developed at all. (That’s not a criticism of him.)

The Prince in the original serenades to Snow White and then they kiss through a dove in one of the most romantic scenes in Disney Animation. No male lead ever did something like that in Disney movies afterwards.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Well on the bright side for Disney I’m already plotting on where I’m going to take the kids to see Stitch in 4DX. They love the trailers and promo. Especially the one of Stitch on the football field.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Not the live actions (actually very rarely any movies). The only time I would have to watch a full movie would be at night, and I'd much rather watch hockey. It's the trouble with movies now, they really need to prove to be worth it for me.
Kinda throws that “own and run your own network and all content” idea to the curb, doesn’t it?

Especially if you go cheap on episodic tv
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Lilo and Stich has everyone (including my kids) SUPER excited, but I will absolutely not go see it out of principle. One ticket I'm sure makes no difference, but I'm standing by it.
I'm in the same boat. I just can't. None of them have been at least as good as the original so I have no real reason not to wait for D+.
because they don’t think they re going to like what they see based off Disneys recent movies and Zeglers comments. So it doesn’t even matter if they actually pulled it off this time.
That brings up an interesting point. Zegler and the weird weird, not saved by the prince, assuming it's a love story because they cast a guy.... We've been told the love story and all that is fully there, and in fact, more fleshed out than the original. So the question is, why such a discrepancy between what she said and what we got? The appearance to me is it was changed with the reshoots. Or was it a very bad attempt at throwing people off? I don't know.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
That brings up an interesting point. Zegler and the weird weird, not saved by the prince, assuming it's a love story because they cast a guy.... We've been told the love story and all that is fully there, and in fact, more fleshed out than the original. So the question is, why such a discrepancy between what she said and what we got? The appearance to me is it was changed with the reshoots. Or was it a very bad attempt at throwing people off? I don't know.
She said it was weird the prince “stalked” the original Snow White. I don’t agree with that characterisation, but regardless, it obviously doesn’t apply to Jonathan.

“She’s not gonna be saved by the prince” chimes with Burnap’s fuller remarks about his character’s role:

It’s a new story in the sense that it’s no longer a princess waiting to be saved by a prince, but a princess waiting to be saved by herself and finding her voice, her strength and her courage and actually, in the end, saving everyone around her.​

It’s certainly possible they added the life-saving kiss when reworking the film, but even with that scene included, the reimagined story is broadly true to what Burnap, Gadot, and Zegler all said: Snow White is no longer a helpless damsel.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
Someone can't be awful for 3+ years towards fans and be redeemable.
I am a fan and don’t feel the least bit bothered by any of her comments about the original film. (Her political remarks and slighting of Gadot did, however, bother me, as I’ve made clear before.) Perhaps the fans who feel as you do shouldn’t allow themselves to be so bothered by a twenty-something’s views on a film from 1937.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom