So when there wasn't an attendance bump when MFSR opened, when the queues weren't long and when people said the ride was a disappointment, many said this made Galaxy's Edge a failure.
Now there seems to be an attendance bump (granted Christmas is busier), the queues are long with boarding passes booked out early every day and ROTR getting absolutely superb reviews, you're saying we shouldn't 'judge it yet'?
Do you not see how this makes it look like you're trying to fit it into your narrative of not liking Galaxy's Edge? I mean you judge MFSR on guest comments and lack of visitors, but then completely ignore those factors when judging ROTR. It's like you're changing the goal posts somewhat.
I realise that with me liking Galaxy's Edge even before ROTR opened, I can be accused of having a biased narrative in favour of it. Maybe that makes me the same as you in a reversed sense, so let's count our personal views out. The general public are no doubt absolutely loving ROTR, to say otherwise is ridiculous. I didn't even think of criticising 'Potterland' when it opened as the public reaction showed how much people enjoyed it. Every so often a new attraction opens and it gets unprecedented positive reviews, it happens so infrequently that when it does it's noticeable. Potter got this as has ROTR, like it or not when that happens it's a pretty reliable way of judging it.
To me anyway it just appears that you're trying really hard to be negative about this land and I'm happy to accept I can be accused of the opposite. Our personal views are just that, but let's not discount the huge number of folks who are loving this ride. To do this reduces the debate to nothing more than nonsense, it deserves far better than that.
Of course time will tell us how successful Rise is overall. If however you're saying it can't be judged till then, then that should work both ways.
