Splash Mountain shows NO mercy XD

Dragonrider1227

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I mean, even when you're just standing by it, waiting for your family to get back from it, those huge splashes can get ya! Sure, it's just a sprinkle, but it's still a splash. I'll bet it's the spirit of Uncle Remis (spelling?) angry that his movie never gets released in the US any more :lol:
 

Dragonrider1227

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
hmm, I thought I was being clear. Oh well. I'll try again. When I was at Splash Mountain, you can get wet, even if you're NOT on the ride. Which gave me the idea that SM shows no mercy whether you are on the ride or not. Then I thought, hey, maybe it's the sprirt of Uncle Remis (still, spelling?) angry that his movie doesn't get released in the states anymore.
 

ssidiouss@mac.c

Well-Known Member
Good article I read about Song Of The South:

The sheer absurdity and utter hypocrisy of "political correctness" is no more clearly on display than in Disney Corp.'s decision to permanently vault Song of the South. No other major hit movie that I am aware of, let alone one that was nominated for multiple Academy awards (as Song of the South and some of its actors were), is being withheld from the public solely because of its "controversial" content. A few great films are currently out of print, but most have recently been in print and are only temporarily out of production due to lack of sufficient demand, copyright issues, or other economic reasons. But Song of the South is being withheld from the public simply because of its content. It will never be shown on TV, cable TV, or pay per view, and will never be available in stores to anyone in the United States.

With all the gruesome, nihilistic, and otherwise disturbing films Hollywood has produced in recent years -- from Fight Club, to Hannibal, to Gangs of New York, to Sin City -- Song of the South is too offensive to be released to the public? Unbelievable! I can understand why people objected to Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Passion of the Christ. I wouldn't want my kids seeing those kind of movies. But I would gladly and unhesitatingly show them Song of the South. There is nothing offensive about it at all.

Instead of portraying black people as profane, volitile, and thuggish, as they are portrayed so often today on MTV and BET and in movies and "music", Song of the South shows the black characters to be gentle, benevolent, and even role models for white children. A poignant moment in the film shows a close-up of Uncle Remus' black hand interlocked with the little white hand of the boy. Remember, this was in 1946, before Brown v. Board of Education and before the civil rights movement. Walt Disney, who personally cast Uncle Remus, was a man ahead of his times.

Despite its message of interracial brotherhood, Song of the South still is not politically correct enough by modern standards. Even though the film takes place after the abolition of slavery, political correctness demands that blacks living at that time in America (and especially in the South) be portrayed as victims. There has to be explicit discrimination, brutality, and suffering. At least one white person must be portrayed as an evil bigot. And blacks certainly can't be portrayed as happy. Uncle Remus was just too cheerful. He should have been infused with militancy, refusing to help the privileged white family and demanding Affirmative Action, and yelling "black power" like a leader in the Nation of Islam. Instead, Uncle Remus was a happy, caring person with not one ounce of hate or resentment in him. And for that, he has been banned.

The NAACP has requested that Disneyland dismantle the scenery from its Splash Mountain ride, because it features Brer Rabbit and the other cartoon characters from Song of the South, though no hint of Uncle Remus. This is Disney's only token acknowledgement of Song of the South. The NAACP would rather kids grow up listening to some gangster rapper glorify crime, violence, and ______ with prostitutes than grow up singing Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah with Uncle Remus. No major record label has banned "cop killer" rap albums. But Disney has banned Uncle Remus.

The NAACP and other purveyors of political correctness don't want black people to be happy. Maybe that sounds extreme, but sadly, that's exactly what it comes down to. Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah is joyful. Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah might encourage lots of black people to enjoy life, to take a break from the angst and victimhood they've been fed by the media and the schools and the politicians, which keeps them dependent on the politicians and on groups like the NAACP. Remember, their power and influence dwindles in direct proportion to blacks' satisfaction with life.

Song of the South is as profoundly anti-segregationist and anti-bigotry as any film I've seen, even though it's not a political film and has no axe to grind. I bet thousands of people who believed negative stereotypes about blacks being dangerous or otherwise unfit for whites to befriend had their minds and their hearts changed by Song of the South. Even if you walked into the theater in 1946 hating black people, you would not walk out feeling hateful. You couldn't, unless you were a total sociopath.

You can still buy import and bootleg versions of Song of the South on ebay, but this movie deserves much wider availability and restored/remastered DVD treatment. That a culture elevates absolute trash with no redeeming value to prime time TV (i.e., Fear Factor) and to the top of the box office charts (i.e., the sleazed up version of Dukes of Hazzard) but suppresses a genuinely good-hearted movie and a landmark in the history of animation and cinema, shows what backward times we live in today.

Better get your copy of Gone from the Wind before it too is banned (it's been declared "racist" for the same reasons that Song of the South has).
 

dandaman

Well-Known Member
I should save that article or something... I personally didn't get why Disney's vaulting this masterpiece. I still don't, but at least whoever wrote the article was able to put my thoughts on the subject into words for me.
 

radiohost

Well-Known Member
Disney has announced that SONG OF THE SOUTH will be released in the fall of 2006 to mark the 60th anniversary of the movie.......you can find this credibility by using an internet search engine,,,,radiohost:cool:
 

PrinceLuver

New Member
I have to agree with that article. Song of the South is so simple in compairison to everything else out there. The websites ive seen about the release are still all saying hopefully, as is what im saying. Disney shouldnt go back on what they say, but odder things have happened. Ever since i heard about SotS Ive wanted to get it and have hoped for a master release of it!!
 

Sledge

Account Suspended
1disneydood said:
On this subject, any idea if Disney does actually own the rights to Brer Rabbit??

I ask this because Universal is releasing a Brer Rabbit feature in March 06. :veryconfu
http://www.animatedbliss.com/DVD/details.asp?title=Adventures+of+Brer+Rabbit
Aw, bunk. :lol: Even if they can do this its pretty stupid. I don't like the fact that they can release it. I thought Disney had all the rights to it. It'll be exactly like Splash Mountain.

Y'all hear the new rumor that Disney might be getting rid of Splash Mountain since SotS is so OLD and Universal has a NEW Brer Rabbit movie coming out. Apparently they don't want any confusion with their attraction and a competitor's film. It's true. :lookaroun
 

Mr Bill

Well-Known Member
radiohost said:
Disney has announced that SONG OF THE SOUTH will be released in the fall of 2006 to mark the 60th anniversary of the movie.......you can find this credibility by using an internet search engine,,,,radiohost:cool:
The only result I find that makes any mention of a DVD release is JimHillMedia...so yeah...
 

CoffeeJedi

Active Member
1disneydood said:
On this subject, any idea if Disney does actually own the rights to Brer Rabbit??
You can't own rights to a character like Br'er Rabbit, its like owning the rights to Santa Claus, Robin Hood, or the Greek gods. It's an old story based in African American folk traditions, it doesn't have any one "author". What Disney owns is their specific likeness and VERSION of Br'er Rabbit, but not the character himself.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom