DoleWhipDrea
Well-Known Member
The large one on the left wasn't working for a while, but they got it back up again recently.
Well public companies don’t stop at “we’ve made enough for the day” and evidently they just don’t see the value in spending their own money to update Spaceship Earth. I can’t fault them for wanting to make money, I just wonder if they’re doing the best job at it.OK this might be a silly question probably, but does Disney NEED to have a sponsor to underwrite the construction or refurbishment or maintenance of an attraction? In the early years when they were stretching financially to build the parks I can understand how this would have helped...but today when the cost of visiting as a guest have skyrocketed from entry tickets and hotel, merch and food, can they not afford to invest in their parks without additional underwriting by Kimberly Clark or Pepsi?
I thought everything looked pretty good today for the most part, except the burning rome scent is turned off. The star lights in the ascent have been improved and brightened. I wont even start on the descent however; we all know.
Yeah, we have known for nearly 13 years.I wont even start on the descent however; we all know.
Stop it penguin! Stop ruining my favorite Epcot attraction with pesky facts!Burning *Library of Alexandria..*
Rome is the "all roads lead to Rome, the first communication network" scene.
As if established continental trade routes weren't 2000 years old by that time.... otherwise, how could the Phoenicians share their alphabet?
In fairness, it was "Burning Rome" in every version of the script until the Dench iteration:Burning *Library of Alexandria..*
Rome is the "all roads lead to Rome, the first communication network" scene.
As if established continental trade routes weren't 2000 years old by that time.... otherwise, how could the Phoenicians share their alphabet?
It didn't feel so dour when the ride's finale ended on a sufficiently inspiring note, and when the park had a number of different attractions that balanced with different chords of humor.I love this ride but wow the past versions were so dry. The Judy Dench version injected some much needed life into the ride.
I still think it could hugely benefit from a major overhaul, much like Hershey’s did with their chocolate tour ride in 2008, if anyone’s been on that. Living with the Land is probably even more ripe for that kind of a change.
The current script is the worst one.I love this ride but wow the past versions were so dry. The Judy Dench version injected some much needed life into the ride.
I still think it could hugely benefit from a major overhaul, much like Hershey’s did with their chocolate tour ride in 2008, if anyone’s been on that. Living with the Land is probably even more ripe for that kind of a change.
And I would concur due to the number of historical and factual inaccuracies.The current script is the worst one.
Sure, that’s your opinion.The current script is the worst one.
Sure, that’s your opinion.
I’d wager most people do not find it insultingly stupid but rather more interesting. But again you’re welcome to your opinion.And one I'm very comfortable with, and in good company with. When whoever wrote the script has to "inject life" by comparing ancient roads to 'the world wide web", and copying books as "the world's first backup"... It's an insultingly stupid script, one very much reflective of and in line with what current Disney management thinks of consumers.
My favorite version of the ride is the Irons version, but I don't mind the current one as much as some do....I’d wager most people do not find it insultingly stupid but rather more interesting. But again you’re welcome to your opinion.
I mean, in theory it wouldn't take much. Remove those dusty black cloths off of all the original scenary, swap out the soundtrack, turn off those stupid ride screens and we're done.If they would just bring back the retro 80's tomorrows child ending.. you'd think Zack would be all over that idea.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.