You're twisting my words. Lemme try to untwist...
"Who is cutting the line ?????"
Anyone that does not wait in the line as long as I do. And yes, this includes pay-to-cut people if it makes it more equitable.
"that fakers effect everybody because they cut in"
Yes, that is correct.
"Your justification that because someone can do "specific" things that , in your eyes, they are faking their condition"
"Just because someone can "walk" does not mean they are a faker"
In my eyes they are more likely to be faking their condition. I never said they are faking their condition. While you may chose to view the world through rose colored glasses, does not mean that everybody does. ...or should.
"My point is you will never know this.......That fact that you think you do - - - is an unrealistic judgemental notion"
I never said I know it. I implied I suspect it. There is a big difference. The probabilities, and public opinion, shift when a person has no symptoms. That is far from unrealistic. My whole point of posting in this thread is to say that people with disabilities might avoid some judgment if they eased up on acting perfectly healthy in front of people that are already agitated because of the situation. I get it, you are saying they shouldn't have to. I heard you. Heck, you are right from some perspectives. ...but that doesn't make my statement incorrect.
"I have never seen someone do this, I seriously doubt anyone has......using this as an example as to why "fakers" effects you really does not make any sense."
Neither have I. I explained it in the next sentence that you selectively left off.
I see the world differently than you. You have such a beautiful pristine view of people. It is very admirable. I hope that you never get hurt because of your perspective. I on the other hand, have experienced a different world. A world full of liars, cheats, thieves and even murderers hurting other people. I have learned to be aware of behaviors and other indicators increasing the probability that somebody is up to no good. This has served me well.
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, you would be a fool not to consider for a moment that it might in fact, be a duck. I am not going to assume it is not a duck, just because it is wearing a "not a duck" sign around it's neck.
To roll with the duck analogy... if you are not a duck, best to not quack, walk, and look like a duck. ...if you can at all help it.