Goofyernmost
Well-Known Member
I would agree, not a lot, or at least not a lot that we know of, but, to me, it doesn't matter. With the old one there was no transition at all and that was a complaint at the time, if I recall. I look at it as entertainment, I am not looking for factual things. If a plane, bird, elephant or polar bear adds to the movie I'm absolutely OK, with it. WDW is a haven of Fantasy, why would we be surprised that we might find fantasy within its attractions. I love that type of transition. I'm smart enough to know that it isn't really happening, but, I am impressed with how smoothly they made it seem like it was. What's wrong with that? If I want actual facts I will go to a science museum. Disney is for fun, adventure and laughter. I don't want logical life type experiences. If I want to know how wild animals would react... I'd go to Africa and fly low over a herd of Elephants.I seem to be busting on you a lot lately, but I wouldn't say "a lot" of CGI exists in the old one. A couple of items, like the golf ball and maybe the hang glider. But most of it is pure scenery. I also have a hard time with the CGI transitions in the current show. It really takes me out of it all to see an elephant throwing up a big snootful of dust at just the right moment.