I'll try some different layouts and see which one we like best! Doesn't take too long since I've shut off details for the night in favor of more big picture canvases.
This seems like a simpler, more compact resort layout. Would be curious to hear other people's opinions in the morning. I like the out-and-back rapid transport, which come to think of it saves on space and track expenses. DisneySEA (OMG, he's bringing it up again!!Take Two
- Forgot to add in the cardinal directions...but diagonally pointing to the top left is south, diagonally to the bottom right...is north.
- Tried to combine UOR and TDR layouts...with the main Parking towards the entrance...and a moving walkway to CityWalk. (The Parking Lot/Garage could also be a 3rd Gate down the line if we wanted to buy up more land.
- Where TDR comes in is the rapid transit...however, rather than a continuous loop...it goes from one end to the other. Similar to the MBTA if anyone has been to Boston...you take the Green line till the end of the line, then take another line to go back. Same here, with Isla Nublar and Suess Landing as the two end point stations, the Mediterannean Resorts, City Walk/two parks/parking lot (Universal Central Station?), Minion Family Resort, being the other stops.
- Backstage is behind the parks and connects the service road to Hogwarts (which I'm assuming to keep the theme of Hogwarts as a boutique resort...guests will board vehicles designed to tint out the exterior backstage areas to keep theme with HP
- Similarly with Nintendo (which I think I might flip with the Cartoon Corner anyway) this can be access by part to park transit, if we wanted to, relatively easily, just going through the backstage areas like the Hogwarts Express.
Let me know what you think!
) has its elevated Electric Railway transportation ride in the park which works like that, and it's surprisingly efficient and fun.
Sounds good! Will see what people think tomorrow (going to pack it in for tonight) and look at this layout and other possibilities with fresh eyes tomorrow!This seems like a simpler, more compact resort layout. Would be curious to hear other people's opinions in the morning. I like the out-and-back rapid transport, which come to think of it saves on space and track expenses. DisneySEA (OMG, he's bringing it up again!!
Leave Nintendo where it is. We can still connect from there to Pokémon if need be. Some Pokémon transport possibilities - the Magnet Train (bullet train) or the slower S.S. Aqua cruise ferry.
Forgot to mention how much I love this sketch. If that ever becomes a reality this could make the character greetings inside the Toothsome Chocolate Emporium much more interesting since there aren't that many Illumination characters that meets guests besides the Despicable Me characters. Plus they even have a talking robot.
@S.P.E.WGood morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
@DisneyManOneGood morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
@D HindleyGood morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
@kmbmw777Good morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
@MANEATINGWREATHGood morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
@orlando678-Good morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
@mickeyfan5534Good morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
@Brer OswaldGood morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
@BigThunder26Good morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
@StevenUGood morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
I vote for Design A!Good morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
Sounds good! -- Thanks for voting!
Good morning everyone!
Based on our discussions last night - I have a question to propose today before we continue on with the resort construction. We're trying to decide how to arrange everything within the resort complex. The resort is currently going in Australia (in a patch of land approximately the size of Universal Orlando Resort)
We have 3 drafts of maps for our parks, the original Universal opening day park (temporarily named UniMK)
The resort's second park (temporarily named UniSEA)
And the resort's water park - named Suess Landing.
----------------------------------
The question is - how to arrange it. Taking influence from both the Tokyo Disney Resort and the Universal Orlando Resort, we have two options for layouts as of now, with the additional areas such as resort hotels, CityWalk, and a rapid transit system (the black line in the designs) included in the layouts
The Question is -- which design would you prefer and why? Design A? Design B? Or Neither (your own suggestion)
Any and all responses would be appreciated! Thanks!
Design A
Design B
