With such a talented cast -- I think the elimination rules need to be fine tuned to ensure that this type of situation doesn't keep happening where subjectivity decides the entire game. I mean, naturally there will be some form of it -- but having a defined rubric for eliminations could help immensely.
Just imho, I don't think that quantity of brainstorming should be a factor, or if it is, at least not a primary factor. Briefly looking over Younger's thread -- we are talking about one person who posted twice...once to say good job and another to say i don't think this will work. Then we have another who posted once to sign up for art and say good job. It's 2 posts to 1 post over 4 days. That really can't be the determining factor.
Quality of brainstorming however could be a factor. For instance, someone could in one post provide the idea that defines the whole project, compared to someone like me who might post 50 times, but 30 of those are memes And then definitely the quality of the finished product that you produce.
And if ever it's a toss up, then what your past accomplishments in the challenges should factor in. Have you done great things or kinda skirted by. Stuff like that. I respect the judges' decision though despite knowing how much of a talent MCParradox is on the forum. You're an awesome imagineer -- don't forget that!
We'll definitely keep all this in mind. This is the first season we've been nominating people as judges since season six. You're right, with such a talented cast we need to keep things as objective as possible. Really the one thing that came down between Parradox vs. Harrington, as I said, is that we felt Harrington deserved at least a one round grace period after entering the game past the first project. You might argue and say he got a reprieve from the first project as well, but this is Harrington's first time playing since season ten and he's jumping into a team that's already established a rapore with each other in the first project. It might not be the popular decision, but I feel it's the right one and I'm sure MEW can back me up on that.
We definitely look at the quality of brainstorming for sure. If someone contributes the idea that defines the project, that will most likely give you a pass right there as it's a pivotal part of how the project came together. If we see someone who's posting a lot but only really saying fringe stuff like "good job!", "I like that idea!" etc. then we'll definitely consider eliminating them over someone who posted less but with more substance to the final project. As you said with a cast this large it's going to be a very difficult road, and one I'm SURE will be filled with unpopular eliminations just by default since everyone in the cast is a power player in their own way. The only thing we as judges can do is take all the feedback you guys provide and use it to fine-tune our judgement moving forward.