The attraction isn’t incomprehensible because it lacks IP. It’s incomprehensible because it’s a beat for beat recreation of Spider-Man which itself is a largely incomprehensible assault of characters (that just happen to be well known and make people ignore the story flaws)
Yes, but personally none of those rides made me ill when I rode them. I haven't been to Williamsburg since the 1980s so I don't know if this particular ride is (was) more retch-inducing.I'm an every few years visitor to BG and rode this attraction a few years ago...man did that ride make me ill. That is why I have avoided Spiderman and the likes. Is this ride similar to Spiderman/Transformers/Potter?
Robert Niles said:... its original storyline, which many visitors found incomprehensible, as it did not reference any familiar entertainment franchise
Curse of DarKastle uses a ride system that Oceaneering was “inspired” to create after working on The Amazing Adventures of Spider-Man. The Harry Potter attractions use completely different ride systems.I'm an every few years visitor to BG and rode this attraction a few years ago...man did that ride make me ill. That is why I have avoided Spiderman and the likes. Is this ride similar to Spiderman/Transformers/Potter?
I agree 1 billion percent, the only reason to have a replacement is to make it better than the original attraction.I'm more upset this is being replaced by a special events venue than a new ride. But, oh well that's how things go.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.