Chi84
Premium Member
What kind of law do you practice?As a lawyer, I can tell you, in the instance of Sebastians, it's what the menu DOESN'T SAY, that reinforces the idea that it's all you can eat (well it's that and several other things, but I dont want to make this more complicated than it needs to be). It's a menu of "family style" options, however it 1) Doesn't state portion sizes nor is there any defined portion sizes that come out from the kitchen to the table (i.e. a table of 3 will probably get the same serving size as a table of 4 or 5). 2) It only allows you to pick one entree from the menu that then has to be "shared" with the whole table.
I can tell you based on the two simple facts above, that if anybody were to be petty enough and waste their time take Disney to small claims court because they felt they weren't served sufficiently or got what they paid for if Disney chose to "cut them off" from getting refills of their meal, the court would overwhelmingly rule in the favor of the guest. It would reek of a simple case of "bait and switch". If Disney wants to limit the portion sizes below what a court would find reasonable, than they need to clearly define it on the menu. Furthermore, there's still enough lingering online and physical literature that still states that it's "all you care to enjoy" that they can not simply distance themself from until they remove it completely or state otherwise on the menu.