?
I don't get it. Disney has professional engineers with 30 years of experience come and and create a ride, test it, double test it, triple test it, yet it still fails and we speculate as to design reasons (such as banked curves.) Well, why didn't the pro's address this issue? Even those remote control race kits, the ones where you race another matchbox-size car on a twin track, had banked curves in their design - and those things have been around for 20 years.
Also, the "wheelee" feature (which was only used at the beginning of the ride?) seems like an extra moving part not necessary to the ride which means that it's an extra part prone to wear and break down. Why not simplify the mechanisms and lose the unnecessary hydrolics?
I'm not an engineer or physicist, but I know that those types of people were involved in the creation of the ride. Also, that ride was relatively recent, thus modern technology was available to its creation. So what the heck went wrong? Rocket rods and the tower of terror (mgm studios) were built at around the same time... yet tower is lightyears ahead in design and endurence.
There must be some "inside" information about the rocket rods story that we don't know about and probably won't ever know about. I just wish I knew.
Tk