lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
It would be no different than the other outdoor coasters already in the Orlando area.In Orlando, the roof structure would also soak up a lot of rain, especially late afternoon summer thunderstorms. Do we know if the ride would need to shut down in the rain (like TT) if it is not covered?
The roof itself was the headache. The two levels are poorly organized, but hardly anything challenging. It would also be possible to provide cover without using the same roof design intent.I don't think there's any way Tron gets built without the outdoor portion and light package. That's the whole deal with TRON in Shanghai.
Beyond that, if I look from it from a bean counter's perspective... The smaller the building, the less ongoing heating/AC and maintenance I've gotta do on that building. That might not be huge, but I could see TDO factoring that kind of BS in.
It's all already engineered. The plans have already been drawn up. That's probably a LARGE portion of the resources it consumed during design/construction for Shanghai. The cost for a second glass canopy would be much less than Shanghai.
If there's a cost/design problem with the Shanghai design, it would be the multi-level setup of Shanghai. But Martin has suggested TRON would majorly change sightlines, which would suggest the multi-level design sticks.
@marni1971??
I don't see it happening... But if they pass THIS up in favor of a warehouse... It would be another lasting memory of TDO's ineptitude.
The concept and design intent being the same does not mean the design is complete, can be copied or is the same. Certain challenges will be known, but you’re still in a completely different context. So while you save money because you know your direction, there is still a large chunk of design work that would be needed.