Well, you just tell Disney corporate they shouldn’t have built the attraction in the early 80s.
They could at least put some air brush murals of hot rod cars with flames shooting out their tail pipes.
Well, you just tell Disney corporate they shouldn’t have built the attraction in the early 80s.
Right. Apparently the view of SSE is acceptable (of course it is. No one argues that) but TT isn’t. Inconsistency anyone?
Right. Apparently the view of SSE is acceptable (of course it is. No one argues that) but TT isn’t. Inconsistency anyone?
And the ugly entrance canopyThe tin can of TT was also the tin can of WOM. The only difference is the outside track.
Hey, thanks! You know I love a good pedantic post!!
The tin can of WoM looks awful from across WS Lagoon.
And the ugly entrance canopy
1. There is a question of 'not being allowed' to voice a criticism. No one's being banned for being critical. I think some people think that being disagreed with is tantamount to being silenced. It's not.
2. If you're going to be critical, it helps the case you make to others if your criticism is not inconsistent.
- If a building in the sightline shouldn't be there because it's not themed, then all other non-themed buildings should fall under the same criticism, no?
- And what exactly makes a building themed? How is a cylindrical metal building considered 'themed', but a cubic colored building is not?
- Why are highly architecturally themed buildings in the background when you look south considered as 'breaking theme' but less architecturally themed buildings in the background when you face north as not 'breaking theme'?
That 'tin can' is pretty damn sexy. You just can't see it with the giant canopy and outdoor track uglying things up.I've gone on tears about the tin can of Test Track and the ceiling tiles of IaSW. No one ever told me I can't criticize that.
That 'tin can' is pretty damn sexy. You just can't see it with the giant canopy and outdoor track uglying things up.
The building IS "themed" all the way around. Let's ask @marni1971 though, just for fun.We're talking about the backside as seen from World Showcase. For some people, the Swolphin gets savaged for breaking the sightline, yet the unthemed backside of that metallic cylinder looming over Mexico's shoulder somehow gets a pass.
The building IS "themed" all the way around. Let's ask @marni1971 though, just for fun.
I have never noticed it at all, and didn’t even know about it until visiting this site. I still don’t notice it now, even knowing that it’s there. I don’t go to Disney to look for things that aren’t done just right.Pity the 112,000 guests who saw it then. Assuming your figure is correct.
Some people are more observant than others I guess.I don’t go to Disney to look for things that aren’t done just right.
I’m not saying he doesn’t.His thoughts are on record. We know we disagree with each other. He allows people to have opinions that differ from his.
I’m not saying he doesn’t.
But to say that WoM/TT isn’t themed all the way around is simply false. It may not be something you like, but it is themed.
It's themed as the Motion Pavilion. The way you're talking suggests the building is somehow finished on that side, which is simply untrue. It's finished all the way around the way it is finished when viewed from the front of the building (minus the lousy canopy that blocks much of that finish from the front).And what is the backside of TT/WoM themed as?
And how is the Swolphin unthemed?
It's themed as the Motion Pavilion. The way you're talking suggests the building is somehow finished on that side, which is simply untrue. It's finished all the way around the way it is finished when viewed from the front of the building (minus the lousy canopy that blocks much of that finish from the front).
Whether you think it fits the theming of World Showcase or not is your opinion, but like all Future World Pavilions it was designed to be seen from World Showcase, much the way there is a grand vista into World Showcase from Future World. There was never any meaningful attempt at masking FW Pavilions from WS or vice versa, so it seems unfair to single out the WOM building for its visibility. FW and WS Pavilions are not meant to share the same architectural language, but they were meant to live harmoniously in one park.
Your mileage may vary on whether that's a good idea, or successfully implemented, it seems.
It’s themed as the backside of TT/WoM!And what is the backside of TT/WoM themed as?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.