No, I’m equating how some people think it’s not Disney unless it’s covered in cartoons. I’m talking about a bigger picture than hotel rooms, and I’m not getting lost in the weeds.
Okay - just confused because we were talking about hotel rooms.
No, I’m equating how some people think it’s not Disney unless it’s covered in cartoons. I’m talking about a bigger picture than hotel rooms, and I’m not getting lost in the weeds.
They have a real Escher thing going on with the flooringFrom tikiman's web page (facebook was giving me fits this morning)
View attachment 537814
The wallpaper doesn't look as "loud" here - If anything this picture evokes the "Royal Pacific" rooms of Universal
All the photos released so far have filters on them. The Tikiman Facebook photos make the colors pop a lot, but we'll have to wait for more examples to get a more accurate idea.From tikiman's web page (facebook was giving me fits this morning)
View attachment 537814
The wallpaper doesn't look as "loud" here - If anything this picture evokes the "Royal Pacific" rooms of Universal
From tikiman's web page (facebook was giving me fits this morning)
View attachment 537814
The wallpaper doesn't look as "loud" here - If anything this picture evokes the "Royal Pacific" rooms of Universal
It actually makes my eyes hurt in that photo. Hopefully that’s just the effect of the filter.They have a real Escher thing going on with the flooring
I really appreciate this post. It articulated a lot of what frustrates me these days about being a Disney fan. Maybe watching “the boys”, Mary poppins, and reading one Walt biography could be a Disney fan starter pack or something. (Just joking around!!!)The #1 issue affecting many enthusiastic fans: they think the marketing hype is Disney. Over the years on multiple forums, I’ve encountered many people who call themselves fans but refuse to watch the “old” stuff made during Walt’s lifetime. They also have no appreciation for classic attractions.
You don’t have to love everything, but if you don’t appreciate classic Disney at the very least, you’re not a Disney fan. You’re a fan of Disney Conglomerate Marketing. You’ve been had by slick sales pitches, not by sincere creative content. If you think it’s not Disney without cartoons slapped on everything, you’re blinded by the last decade of toy sales. Disney was much, much more than princess toons from the 1940s through early 2000s. There’s no way to say this without sounding harsh, but please understand I mean this in a very honest, kind way.
Mi-ckey... mouse? Who dat?I really appreciate this post. It articulated a lot of what frustrates me these days about being a Disney fan. Maybe watching “the boys”, Mary poppins, and reading one Walt biography could be a Disney fan starter pack or something. (Just joking around!!!)
See, that I really disagree with but it may be a question of taste.I'm sure the new beds ARE comfortable... But they don't LOOK it. And all the charm of a white slab in a morgue. But this is the trend at Disney resorts these days; trying to look "modern."
Agree but I am always freezing in these beds. They need to add weight somehow. A white duvet inside a removeableSee, that I really disagree with but it may be a question of taste.
I'm not keen on the characters, but I do prefer hotel beds to look fresh and clean which is how I think these beds look.
Riviera is probably the quintessential example of the issues many people have with the direction Disney has been taking with their hotels. It’s a lumpy mass of poorly designed rectangles with a little ornamentation glued on like a McMansion. The interiors are an admitted mishmash of contradicting styles plus some, decorated with random characters that are not related to the Riviera.I think Riviera is a good example of Disney integrated in rooms w/out being over the top. Just some great artwork. Around the entire hotel actually.
In a standard hotel room, what is more prominent than the TV wall?I still don't see the Poly rooms as in your face Moana.
I have to say, for as much as people bemoan Single IP Lands (and make no mistake, there are things to bemoan) I do think somewhere in there the impulse to build them is driven a little bit by this idea - if someone views WDW as a collection of less-real versions of real-world places, projects like Pandora and Galaxy's Edge disrupt that perception. If you want to visit those places, there's no alternative but Disney.Aww. I love this picture. My grandma would've loved that room. She had similar rooms in her home at one point. Her dream in life was to go to Hawaii. She loved Disneyland. She never got to WDW, or Hawaii, but she did enjoy Adventureland.
I have to wonder how the ability to travel impacts Disney. Part of the appeal of Disney theming, at least for my grandmother, was to be able to experience a little bit of a place she'd never be able to go to (or at least a perception of that place). Now we have planes that can go halfway around the world in a single flight. I've been to Hawaii multiple times and have the ability to go to Polynesian islands. Most of the resorts at WDW are fashioned after places I have traveled to. So what makes someone stay at one vs. another?
(ETA: Tuvalu pointed out that's the Contemporary, not the Poly, which makes sense. Still reminds me of my grandmother.)
Riviera is probably the quintessential example of the issues many people have with the direction Disney has been taking with their hotels. It’s a lumpy mass of poorly designed rectangles with a little ornamentation glued on like a McMansion. The interiors are an admitted mishmash of contradicting styles plus some, decorated with random characters that are not related to the Riviera.
In a standard hotel room, what is more prominent than the TV wall?
Disney continues to power through in the modern world
Why exactly should we want Disney to "adapt to the modern world"? The modern world stinks! It's full of fighting and viruses and wars and shootings and unfunny memes and hashtags and fights and trying to cash in on the success of more popular things. Disney theme parks are supposed to be whimsical, magical, and fun - an escape from the havoc and vileness of the modern world. Disney tried to "adapt to the modern world" in the 1990s too, and it resulted in crap like Mickey Unrapped and Quack Pack.even those lamenting Splash Mountain which is also adapting to the modern world
I distinctly remember those comforters...
Imagine if the new Star Wars hotel had graphics of the characters on the walls of the room. Would you consider that theming or making it more "Star Wars"? Or would you think that detracts from the intended setting?
Right now Star Wars and Avatar are the two properties where theme integrity is treated in a noticeably different way than the rest of the resort, to the detriment of everything else.
Exactly what are you disagreeing with because you seem to be agreeing.I disagree with you on both counts. Respectfully.
I like the Disney artwork in Riviera. It's gorgeous. I'd rather see those hanging on the walls than some paintings of fields or vases. It's just art - I don't think it really is IP theming - save for possibly Aristocats.
Why do beautiful art pieces portraying different scenes/characters from all different Disney movies need to be related to the resort? And isn't having luxury type art kind of in theme with a luxury (YMMV) hotel on the French/Italian Riviera? (yes, I know that's not a thing). Why can't it be Disney art?
The feature wall does remind me of a Polynesian tattoo, and yes it is prominent.
Also, my favorite Disney movie is Pinocchio and my favorite ride of all time is Peter Pan. So I like classic Disney and I like the new hotel design. (I'm still unclear as to why we are discussing that topic on a thread about hotel room decor)
How?Apples and oranges.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.