You mean the ones outside of Disney property that aren’t 300% fair market value?It looks fine and is much more themed than most resorts in Orlando.
You mean the ones outside of Disney property that aren’t 300% fair market value?
The ball lights in the nylon nets are still so bad. I can't wrap my head around the fact that they're final when they already did similar fixtures correctly elsewhere in the resort. Just, why?
The ball lights in the nylon nets are still so bad. I can't wrap my head around the fact that they're final when they already did similar fixtures correctly elsewhere in the resort. Just, why?
Are there other exterior ones I am forgetting about at the moment? Exterior lighting is going to have to be engineered to meet Florida Product Approval requirements for attachment (has to hold up to wind). They also have to be weather resistant and output a certain amount of light. All together you do have different constraints that’ll inform the final fixture.I know I'm pretty negative, but I honestly can't think of any good reason beyond just not really caring.
"They're ball lights in a net, that's what we did elsewhere, right? This is good enough."
That doesn't mean they have to look bad/cheap though.Are there other exterior ones I am forgetting about at the moment? Exterior lighting is going to have to be engineered to meet Florida Product Approval requirements for attachment (has to hold up to wind). They also have to be weather resistant and output a certain amount of light. All together you do have different constraints that’ll inform the final fixture.
Are there other exterior ones I am forgetting about at the moment? Exterior lighting is going to have to be engineered to meet Florida Product Approval requirements for attachment (has to hold up to wind). They also have to be weather resistant and output a certain amount of light. All together you do have different constraints that’ll inform the final fixture.
It is a little known fact that the Polynesians were early masters of pre stressed concrete column forming.It’s “modern”.
I can’t remember if it’s lighted, but there’s this at Pago Pago:Are there other exterior ones I am forgetting about at the moment? Exterior lighting is going to have to be engineered to meet Florida Product Approval requirements for attachment (has to hold up to wind). They also have to be weather resistant and output a certain amount of light. All together you do have different constraints that’ll inform the final fixture.
Funny you mention that one. I know I had a picture of one of the other ball lights and that was it:I can’t remember if it’s lighted, but there’s this at Pago Pago:
View attachment 604366
Now that looks fantastic!Funny you mention that one. I know I had a picture of one of the other ball lights and that was it:
…so Riviera then?No I mean the ones that look like a Motel 6, even though they are advertised as a great resort.
…right…Florida is known far and wide as a regulatory “stickler”Are there other exterior ones I am forgetting about at the moment? Exterior lighting is going to have to be engineered to meet Florida Product Approval requirements for attachment (has to hold up to wind). They also have to be weather resistant and output a certain amount of light. All together you do have different constraints that’ll inform the final fixture.
The ball lights in the nylon nets are still so bad. I can't wrap my head around the fact that they're final when they already did similar fixtures correctly elsewhere in the resort. Just, why?
The new “numbers” head of WDI…and the 15 year “under Iger” head of the board will no doubt help to combat that trendThey're Japanese fishing floats and they are a classic Polynesian Pop / tiki bar decoration, both lit and unlit.
Here's a view from inside La Mariana in Honolulu. I think these lights haven't been dusted since they were installed in 1957.
View attachment 604389
That said, while I think they did a great job with the lobby chandelier, Disney does seem to be overdoing it with that logic of "hey they looked great in there, let's dump them everywhere" which is a bit lazy.
I agree.I know I'm pretty negative, but I honestly can't think of any good reason beyond just not really caring.
"They're ball lights in a net, that's what we did elsewhere, right? This is good enough."
The new “numbers” head of WDI…and the 15 year “under Iger” head of the board will no doubt help to combat that trend
…so Riviera then?
There is a balance there that just isn’t valued anymore. Zach’a problem seems to be he doesn’t understand that the “Rodhe” school didn’t work either…the decades of overspending like sailors in Singapore has repercussions that lower quality too.I agree.
I know everyone likes to laugh at Zach's posts about Epcot, but at least those pay lip service to the idea Disney is supposed to pay attention to small details and the choice of materials used. The message this project sends is that Disney's theming standards are now that if they want to build something that appears to be a wooden structure they'll just paint the steel and concrete brown. Some globes in a net are close enough to glass floats.
It’s been a very tangible/interesting actual news week for TWDC…Whoah boy. I guess I should read the WDI thread and see what you're talking about. I only saw the WDI thread title and thought, "Huh? The Walt Disney Institute is still around?" I forgot about the other I.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.