Brer Oswald
Well-Known Member
Found this video again for those who may have never seen it. Some of us probably don’t need a reminder lol.
“Buy our toys!”
Found this video again for those who may have never seen it. Some of us probably don’t need a reminder lol.
Found this video again for those who may have never seen it. Some of us probably don’t need a reminder lol.
This is probably the video that was shown during the initial pitch
Agreed. The thing that got me was someone part of the SSE and Epcot project was laughing at the reactions to it. It makes you wonder what things are like internally for this kind of stuff to get approved.Photos do tend to make these things look bigger than they are. They are still big tho.
I can personally attest to how massive they are when you walk in from the IG... completely distracting IMO...They're going to look bigger/smaller depending on where you are standing (among other things). They won't be as obtrusive looking from American Adventure back towards Future World because they will be much farther away.
Even looking at them in the best possible light they're unnecessary visual clutter. There's really no good defense for them.
I agree. It is worrying that people within WDI are laughing about people who worry about sightlines in the parks and see that second image as no big deal. Very strongly suggests that what separated Disney parks from those of their competitors has been reduced to bigger budgets and better IPs.Agreed. The thing that got me was someone part of the SSE and Epcot project was laughing at the reactions to it. It makes you wonder what things are like internally for this kind of stuff to get approved.
I'll admit to being biased though. I expect better from Disney when they've proven they can hide show elements until they're needed.
I certainly would be bias or have strong views if I was working on Epcot right now. I know someone who had a hand in EF and was hurt by backlash on that. These people do work hard.Agreed. The thing that got me was someone part of the SSE and Epcot project was laughing at the reactions to it. It makes you wonder what things are like internally for this kind of stuff to get approved.
I'll admit to being biased though. I expect better from Disney when they've proven they can hide show elements until they're needed.
I don't think anybody doubts they work hard, and it's not any individual Imagineer's choice on what gets done here, but all the work and effort in the world put into a bad idea isn't going to make it good (not necessarily directing that at EF)I certainly would be bias or have strong views if I was working on Epcot right now. I know someone who had a hand in EF and was hurt by backlash on that. These people do work hard.
I agree. I just think sometimes seeing all these fans crap on your work can be tough.I don't think anybody doubts they work hard, and it's not any individual Imagineer's choice on what gets done here, but all the work and effort in the world put into a bad idea isn't going to make it good (not necessarily directing that at EF)
No doubt, but there are times where the complaints are more than reasonable. There are (presumably) good things that get stuck in the wrong spot (i.e. Guardians) where backlash based on location is extremely reasonable and less so the content itself, and then there's the Harm disaster which is just inexcusable all the way around, independent of the show.I agree. I just think sometimes seeing all these fans crap on your work can be tough.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.