MagicHappens1971
Well-Known Member
While constitutional law is very complicated, it’s easier to infer things about it than those crazy rantings during the pandemic.And everyone is a constitutional lawyer now…
While constitutional law is very complicated, it’s easier to infer things about it than those crazy rantings during the pandemic.And everyone is a constitutional lawyer now…
Well.. critical thinking is a good skill that can be applied to many things. It's also something that is easy to spot as lacking.And everyone is a constitutional lawyer now…
You’re going to be waiting a very long timeI can’t wait for this to be over.
The facts are the facts and DeSantis and the Republican Legislature are punishing Disney for Disney's speech. The motion to dismiss the Judge admits that by saying rather than abolish the RCID they put it under the control of a handpicked Board. The Govenor cant have it both ways, if abolishing it was okay and not a punishment, then keeping it but changing it to a Board appointed by the Govenor clearly is retaliation. As I have said many times the first bill may have survived but the second, February 9, 2023 wont. Plus based on other US Supreme Court Rulings the Court can keep part of a bill legal and only eliminate the unconstitutional part. In other words, the US Federal Court could rule the portion of the bill dealing with the CFTOD wad unconstitutional but the portion repealing the fist bill stands. Thus, the original RCID is returned to power and the first bill is repealed as the Legislature voted.Alrighty, new pacer filings in Disney v DeSantis.
Motion to disqualify the judge (IMO this is going nowhere), and 4 motions of appearance from CFTOD members, letting the court know to send correspondence, etc to the attorney specified.
Both side judge shop just as both sides disqualify jurors that are not perceived beneficial to your case.Sounds like Judge Shopping to me.
The highest courts will not rule for regulation over famous public traded business with world wide cache and firmly embedded in the ruling class…The facts are the facts and DeSantis and the Republican Legislature are punishing Disney for Disney's speech. The motion to dismiss the Judge admits that by saying rather than abolish the RCID they put it under the control of a handpicked Board. The Govenor cant have it both ways, if abolishing it was okay and not a punishment, then keeping it but changing it to a Board appointed by the Govenor clearly is retaliation. As I have said many times the first bill may have survived but the second, February 9, 2023 wont. Plus based on other US Supreme Court Rulings the Court can keep part of a bill legal and only eliminate the unconstitutional part. In other words, the US Federal Court could rule the portion of the bill dealing with the CFTOD wad unconstitutional but the portion repealing the fist bill stands. Thus, the original RCID is returned to power and the first bill is repealed as the Legislature voted.
I agree.I can’t wait for this to be over.
Sadly….I also agree with thisYou’re going to be waiting a very long time
“Disney is failing” “the ship is crashing” it’s all just conjecture, the company is not doing as well as it was before, but is still successful. As of Q2 they have 10B Cash on handWhere do people keep getting the idea that Disney is short on cash?
Mickey and Minnie have resorted to begging on a street cornerWhere do people keep getting the idea that Disney is short on cash?
If the second bill is reversed but not the first bill then wouldn’t that mean RCID is dissolved effective June 30? The first bill officially dissolved the special district. The 2nd bill in Feb reversed the first bill (undissolving it….is that a word) and also changed the boardI have to add one more thing. Wouldn't it be great if the only reason Disney can get the RCID back is because DeSantis singed the February 9th bill. The Federal court could say they don't have to rule on the first bill because the second repealed the first bill.
Statute 189.033 was not repealed by the legislation reforming the District. That’s why other districts were also rechartered. That’s why Disney is seeking relief regarding that law.I have to add one more thing. Wouldn't it be great if the only reason Disney can get the RCID back is because DeSantis singed the February 9th bill. The Federal court could say they don't have to rule on the first bill because the second repealed the first bill.
Federal Courts have used severability as a way to only eliminate the unconstituional part of a bill. Therefore the court can only rule on part of the bill if they wish. In this case that would be justice yet still leave open the possibility of ruling on the first bill if Florida Courts ruled the repeal was illegal.If the second bill is reversed but not the first bill then wouldn’t that mean RCID is dissolved effective June 30? The first bill officially dissolved the special district. The 2nd bill in Feb reversed the first bill (undissolving it….is that a word) and also changed the board
You think that's begging? That is Mickey mugging mode activated
You’re going to be waiting a very long time
I thought Mickey mugging mode was lightning laneYou think that's begging? That is Mickey mugging mode activated
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.