News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

[The Mom]

Since the post wasn't deleted I assure it's OK to comment.

No, I actually did not post it to discuss the series itself, or any topics covered in the series . I just thought that some posters might like to view the series since they appear to be interested in the subject, but without commenting here.

 

[lewisc]

No, I actually did not post it to discuss the series itself, or any topics covered in the series . I just thought that some posters might like to view the series since they appear to be interested in the subject, but without commenting here.

If you haven't already done so delete my post

 

[tissandtully]

Why did the post with the tweet about board members ducking service get deleted? That seemed relevant

 

[Figgy1]

Why did the post with the tweet about board members ducking service get deleted? That seemed relevant

PM the mods when there is a question about such matters. As posting about moderation is against the rules and if you PM you'll get an actual response when they're on here. At this hour I'd PM The Mom

 

[DCBaker]

Here's the initial agenda for the next Board of Supervisors meeting on May 24.

 

[Figgy1]

Here's the initial agenda for the next Board of Supervisors meeting on May 24.

View attachment 717019View attachment 717021

Do you know if they will be taking questions?

 

[mkt]

Here's the initial agenda for the next Board of Supervisors meeting on May 24.

View attachment 717023
View attachment 717021

11.2 Get served

 

[lazyboy97o]

Do you know if they will be taking questions?

They never take questions. The public is just allowed to comment. No responses are given.

 

[The Mom]

Why did the post with the tweet about board members ducking service get deleted? That seemed relevant.

The language used in the tweet was insulting, and would be deleted if it was posted here by a forum member.

 

[LittleBuford]

Why did the post with the tweet about board members ducking service get deleted? That seemed relevant

The language used in the tweet was insulting, and would be deleted if it was posted here by a forum member.

Here it is minus the language in question (credit to @Stripes for first bringing this to our attention):

 

[Disstevefan1]

Which will end up being around longer?

These legal fights or the Walls in EPCOT?

 

[Stripes]

The language used in the tweet was insulting, and would be deleted if it was posted here by a forum member.

Sorry, I just wanted to give credit to the person that originally highlighted it. In the future I’ll credit their social media handle.

 

[Stripes]

Return of service on board chair Garcia.

 

[lazyboy97o]

Return of service on board chair Garcia.

View attachment 717034

So how far did they try to push this little game?…

 

[GoofGoof]

Return of service on board chair Garcia.

View attachment 717034

Must be real confident in the outcome of the case

 

[tissandtully]

Return of service on board chair Garcia.

View attachment 717034

I want this job

 

[JKick95]

Must be real confident in the outcome of the case

What does this mean?

 

[GoofGoof]

What does this mean?

Claiming they were not properly served the complaint seems like a pretty desperate attempt to avoid responding. If they had any actual answers they would give them instead.

 

[LittleBuford]

Claiming they were not properly served the complaint seems like a pretty desperate attempt to avoid responding. If they had any actual answers they would give them instead.

They seem utterly in over their heads. And I have to admit that I'm very glad about it.

 

[lazyboy97o]

Claiming they were not properly served the complaint seems like a pretty desperate attempt to avoid responding. If they had any actual answers they would give them instead.

I don’t think it was about trying to avoid answering. As the footnote sort of suggests, it seems like they may have briefly toyed with trying to make timeline arguments regarding the two cases.