I've been reading rather than commenting, but this makes me wonder - could a vendor who signed a contract essentially walk away? This is one sided - the special district doesn't have to honor the contract, but the vendor does. I.E., if conditions that make the contract less appealing to the vendor, could the vendor say "thanks, but no thanks" if the district says "sorry, we don't recognize it, we have to renegotiate?"
They are seeking legal fees as part of their lawsuit.I am curious if when this done can Disney has any of these costs covered by the state?
Fast.
So he has 15 days to return to the state and…..you know…..do his actual jobThe Governor received SB 1604 (revoking RCID development agreement) today. He has until May 20 to act on the bill. (By Statute, after presentation, the Governor has 7 days while the Legislature is in Session and 15 days when the Legislature is not in Session to act on bill. The Legislature adjourned sine die today, making the requirement 15 days.)
Press release here: https://www.flgov.com/2023/05/05/governor-desantis-receives-one-bill-from-the-florida-legislature-9/
Well, he did it today within seconds of the bill being presented to him.So he has 15 days to return to the state and…..you know…..do his actual job
The shocking part isn’t that he signed it…..it’s that he’s actually there to sign it. Probably leaves tomorrow to conduct “state business“ in one of the early primary states. We won’t know since his travel is classified nowAlmost like they messengered it across the plaza to his office.
Yeah he probably has a flight to catchWell, it did it today within seconds of the bill being presented to him.
Yeah he probably has a flight to catch
Disney can’t request monetary damages (other than legal costs) in federal court due to the 11th Amendment. Same reason they sued DeSantis in his official capacity instead of the state of Florida itself.I am curious if when this done can Disney has any of these costs covered by the state?
Rep. Eskamani says the Governor has signed SB 1604 - Land Use and Development Regulations.
They don’t want damagesDisney can’t request monetary damages (other than legal costs) in federal court due to the 11th Amendment. Same reason they sued DeSantis in his official capacity instead of the state of Florida itself.
I think they know they already made their bed. Might as well sleep in it and score political points in the interim. Even if it’s likely all this nonsense gets struck downIt seems to me that, by enacting yet another piece of retaliatory legislation, all the state is really accomplishing is giving Disney more ammunition for their lawsuit.
I still can't tell if they know they don't have case but keep digging themselves into a hole to show their supporters they're "fighting," or if they're just blind idealogues who genuinely think what they're doing is "right."I think they know they already made their bed. Might as well sleep in it and score political points in the interim. Even if it’s likely all this nonsense gets struck down
Nothing about this from day one has been about ideology…I still can't tell if they know they don't have case but keep digging themselves into a hole to show their supporters they're "fighting," or if they're just blind idealogues who genuinely think what they're doing is "right."
Probably some in column A, some in column B.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.