GoofGoof
Premium Member
Maybe I’m just being dense but with eminent domain doesn’t the government have to show in my layman’s terms a compelling public purpose to seize private land. I’m sure the lawyers can correct whatever the proper term is. They can’t just claim the front gate of MK without a compelling reason.If, in the development agreement, Disney
did agree to not contest any land taken by eminent domain, then just wow.
Can you imagine what this hostile board could do with this?
This is why I doubt Disney waived all of its eminent domain rights.
Fingers crossed Disney did not!
Also, doesn’t the agreement require the district to get Disney’s approval first before developing their own land? Isn’t this why they need to void the agreement before breaking ground on the prison? So even if the district did claim Disney property they cannot do anything with the land without Disney signing off. So the district pays Disney for the land and then Disney stops paying taxes to the counties or the district for that land. Seems like a win for the mouse.