News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

JusticeDisney

Well-Known Member
I am serious, right now, the DeSantis district is in power. I hope the DeSantis district doesn't make too much trouble for the day to day operation of WDW as this drags along in the courts for years.

There are obvious ways they could.
That is not correct. They are in power in the sense that they are the new board. However, Disney has the agreement which limits what the new board can do. Those are the facts of what is presently in place. What that means is the new board cannot actually do anything contrary to the agreement, unless and until some sort of temporary injunctive relief is issued in their favor. Of course, the same thing can be said about any efforts by Disney to act in accordance with the agreement but contrary to the new board's wishes. The bottom line is, at this very moment, the board cannot do anything that you are fearful of.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I think the issue is more for his personal ambitions and how he is talking about things. People keep trying to say he is playing to the base, so how is he talking about the base if its all an act?
That base is a “winner” in Florida…for a few more years…but a loser nationally and the gap is widening.

It’s not like all these power brokers don’t know this…they research for future money. All this stuff is tied together.



The obvious rocky/drago reference is true but unnecessary
 
Last edited by a moderator:

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
DeSantis' public statements are more than enough to prove intent to squelch free speech.

For discovery, what would be priceless, is if there are records that show he doesn't really care and this was all for political gain.

Discovery could be broader than that. It's conceivable they could request (and have a right to) any materials that suggest he intended to punish anyone for their speech; not just Disney (the request would not be worded quite like that).
 
Last edited:

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
So to recap how I’m understanding it, the filing currently out there asks for an injunction which reverses the bill which changed the board. If the judge rules in favor of Disney and that injunction goes into effect the board is reverted back to RCID. I said temporary since it’s possible an appeals court reverses that reversal. If Disney also wins on appeal or the case is never appealed then the injunction is permanent and the RCID board is reinstated. The Supreme Court would be the final appeal if the Federal appeals court rules so just 2 levels of appeal and no guarantee the Supreme Court takes the case.

As far as I know Disney hasn’t asked for a temporary or emergency injunction (one that goes into effect immediately before the case is final). I assume that has to be done as a separate filing or motion to the judge and would be based on some direct action by the board that could cause irreparable harm.
Correct. The injunctions mentioned in the suit are permanent injunctions. The laws could stay on the books and just be unenforceable. We saw this recently with abortion where some old state laws once again became enforceable with the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

No temporary or emergency injunctions have been sought at this time. As of right now I’m not sure we would see Disney seek one. The Board doesn’t have an alternate Comprehensive Plan so they can’t really move forward on something like really starting a housing development somewhere. The quickest change they could probably make is increasing the scope of planning review to put more projects before the Board for consideration.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
That is not correct. They are in power in the sense that they are the new board. However, Disney has the agreement which limits what the new board can do. Those are the facts of what is presently in place. What that means is the new board cannot actually do anything contrary to the agreement, unless and until some sort of temporary injunctive relief is issued in their favor. Of course, the same thing can be said about any efforts by Disney to act in accordance with the agreement but contrary to the new board's wishes. The bottom line is, at this very moment, the board cannot do anything that you are fearful of.
There are ways the board absolutely can intercede with Disney without violating the development agreement and restrictive covenants.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I think you grossly underestimate how many people across the US agree with Florida's political path on issues with gender, education, gun laws, etc. Just because one side yells louder doesn't mean there are more of them.

As a independent myself, I do find it all disheartening how fractured our country has become, which I blame social media/media for and irresponsible political figures.

Martin Tv Show GIF by Martin
The problem is underestimation of the affect of young voting FINALLY becoming fashionable and the completely stupid draconian attempts to respond.

I’m not arguing particulars on people or places…I’m just saying that’s what political scientists have been obsessed with since Vietnam. It was and in many way still is the “sleeping giant”…and it’s been foolishly poked the last 3 cycles.

But I won’t argue it and waste people’s time…let’s watch and see
 

mkt

When a paradise is lost go straight to Disney™
Premium Member
As a independent myself, I do find it all disheartening how fractured our country has become, which I blame social media/media for and irresponsible political figures.
Hello fellow independent.

I guess it's because I spent half of my life outside watching the US from the outside, but I've never considered the US to not be fractured. It's only in recent that those fractures became visible to the population who mostly ignored them.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom