News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

[Jambo Dad]

Parental Rights in Education bill. Stop lying and calling it by the other name. That is not journalism to lie like that.

I was about to post the same thing. Calling it “don’t say gay” by our moderator
is a political statement whether intentional or not.

 

[LAKid53]

Sure, and I guess they do not care at all about their credibility over pushing a false narrative.

Again, this is a FAN forum. Not the website of a news organization.

 

[Figgy1]

probably discussing binary numbers

Up there with an attempt to ban Arabic numbers in schools. Actual proposed bill a few years ago

 

[the_rich]

Up there with an attempt to ban Arabic numbers in schools. Actual proposed bill a few years ago

I remember that. The ignorance of some people.

 

[TrainsOfDisney]

I was about to post the same thing. Calling it “don’t say gay” by our moderator
is a political statement whether intentional or not.

So “don’t say gay even when referring to the don’t say gay bill?”

Got it.

 

[mkt]

He kept some interesting company

When they scream "groomers", it's just projection.

 

[SpectroMagician]

I've done bill analysis and drafted legislation. When amending law, you strike out or add language to the section of statute being revised.

What? They are not amending a law, they are passing a new one. Here it is in it's entirety. Seriously people these things are not hard to look up and read.

https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h0003C__.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=0003C&Session=2022C

 

[Figgy1]

I remember that. The ignorance of some people.

Doing calc using Roman numerals sounds like a fun time NOT

 

[lazyboy97o]

What? They are not amending a law, they are passing a new one. Here it is in it's entirety. Seriously people these things are not hard to look up and read.

https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h0003C__.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=0003C&Session=2022C

Try to keep up. There are existing laws that govern dissolution of special districts.

 

[mightynine]

I’m always glad when this thread reopens, gives me a chance to exercise that ignore finger.

 

[SpectroMagician]

Try to keep up. There are existing laws that govern dissolution of special districts.

Try and keep up and read the bill that passed the senate and will head to the house.

 

[lazyboy97o]

Try and keep up and read the bill that passed the senate and will head to the house.

Again, new laws can’t just pretend other laws don’t exist. They have to follow a process.

 

[AEfx]

Up there with an attempt to ban Arabic numbers in schools. Actual proposed bill a few years ago

I remember that. The ignorance of some people.

Care to provide a link to that? Because I think you may be falling prey to believing everything you see on social media.

Because AFAIK, there was a meme passed around about a poll someone did where 50%+ percent of those who chose to respond said they were for banning them, but it's not something that actually happened.

 

[lazyboy97o]

The false narrative that it has anything to do with the word gay, or frankly gay people at all. It has literally nothing to do with that. It has to do with not talking about sex with 5-9 year olds.

If you support talking about sex with young kids then you are a sick freak.

This is simply not true. The author outright said the legislation was intended to stop people from turning gay. The legislation also applies to all ages, even 18 year olds.

 

[SpectroMagician]

Again, new laws can’t just pretend other laws don’t exist. They have to follow a process.

Yes the process of passing a new law as clearly written in the text of the bill that passed the senate. Can you explain how this does not nothing because you seem so sure that this bill if it becomes law does nothing.

 

[lazyboy97o]

Yes the process of passing a new law as clearly written in the text of the bill that passed the senate. Can you explain how this does not nothing because you seem so sure that this bill if it becomes law does nothing.

This has been explained to you. There is a specific way existing laws are modified.

 

[Tom P.]

I was about to post the same thing. Calling it “don’t say gay” by our moderator
is a political statement whether intentional or not.

Yes, I was very dissapointed in @wdwmagic that he used that name in a recent news story on the WDWMagic site without even qualifying it with something like "the so-called...." Very disappointed.

 

[SpectroMagician]

This is simply not true. The author outright said the legislation was intended to stop people from turning gay. The legislation also applies to all ages, even 18 year olds.

Can you show me where in the bill it says anything about people "turning gay"? Where in the bill it mentions anything to do with gay at all?

 

[the_rich]

Baseless? They are lying about the bill. What reason would someone have to lie about the bill other than being a fan of talking about sex with 5-9 year olds?

Can you tell me why?

The law bans anything they want. All they have to say it is offensive and that's it. It gives them carte Blanche to get rid of anything they want. And clearly the author of the bill was targeting lgbtq.

 

[mightynine]

Care to provide a link to that? Because I think you may be falling prey to believing everything you see on social media.

Because AFAIK, there was a meme passed around about a poll someone did where 50%+ percent of those who chose to respond said they were for banning them, but it's not something that actually happened.

Oh, that poll happened:

Did 56% of Survey Respondents Say 'No' to Teaching Arabic Numerals?

It's difficult to answer survey questions if you don't fully understand their meaning.

www.snopes.com