News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

That's pretty much it. The DeSantis team COMPLETELY ignored the RCID board meetings during their victory lap.
I really can’t wait to see what late night skits come of this! I can’t stop laughing just reading through the pages here on the forum. 🤣

Mickey Mouse Goodbye GIF
 

GrumpyFan

Well-Known Member
I think they still very much deserve the criticism. Disney remains silent on the supposed instigating issue which the state is set to expand through rule making authority.
Disagree. I think they executed this superbly keeping it behind the scenes and not causing more public backlash. Chapek exposed them to a lot of public criticism with his reckless moves and this was done just as it should have been.
 

Big_Shakalaka

Well-Known Member
And absolutely no one who was paying attention said anything about it, which is amazing. Not even a local news company reporting on it? Fantastic.
Edit: I do remember somewhere (maybe even this site) posting about the future state hotel/park "plans" for 10 years out that is on the page following the one with this information. And yet still nothing about the previous page :D
I've worked at local municipal meetings and I can say... often contracts and such aren't read aloud or even shown to attendees. They are often just referenced generally, then voted on, unless there are motions for further detail. So, to those in attendance, it can look as just general day-to-day stuff with little fanfare. It sounds like these contracts were done in much a similar manor.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I love a good happy ending. 😂
This still isn’t necessarily a happy ending. The Board currently seems willing to spend Disney’s money litigating the land development agreements. They can also still do things like fire plan reviewers to drag out the permitting process. Or send in the fire department to aggressively enforce the Florida Fire Prevention Code. Or exercising their new powers regarding ride safety.

This agreement would have committed the counties to a level of service they were likely to not want to maintain. It would have staved off the apathy or disfunction of a split board. It impairs but does not stop a hostile board.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
This still isn’t necessarily a happy ending. The Board currently seems willing to spend Disney’s money litigating the land development agreements. They can also still do things like fire plan reviewers to drag out the permitting process. Or send in the fire department to aggressively enforce the Florida Fire Prevention Code. Or exercising their new powers regarding ride safety.

This agreement would have committed the counties to a level of service they were likely to not want to maintain. It would have staved off the apathy or disfunction of a split board. It impairs but does not stop a hostile board.
Political retribution for profit is still the big Risk for Disney.

It’s still a potential mess
 

eddie104

Well-Known Member
I think they still very much deserve the criticism. Disney remains silent on the supposed instigating issue which the state is set to expand through rule making authority.


I really don’t think they were. This agreement would have kept things in place if the District was devolved to the counties.
Just admit it you were wrong to criticize them this time. Nobody is all knowing on this forum no need to act like you’re expert on everything concerning Disney.

This board needs to tread lightly with all this legal talk because this whole process could have been easily stalled. DeSantis is clearly in over his head.
 

jpeden

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Does this give Disney a legal back door to invalidate the entire law? Basically the lawsuit or contract would have been unnecessary if the district hadn’t been dissolved. The dissolution of the district can now be shown to cause actual, tangible potential harm to the Walt Disney Company.
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
Hubris in action- there is always someone cleverer than you!

Seriously though it would be interesting to see how this works legally.

The royal proclamation (which I witnessed being read out) said:

‘Prince Charles Philip Arthur George, is now, by the death of our late Sovereign of happy memory, become our only lawful and rightful liege lord, Charles III, by the grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of his other realms and territories, King, head of the Commonwealth, defender of the faith’

England is a part of Great Britain (along with Scotland and Wales) so the King is King of England in the same way that Biden is President of Florida - its a legal fact but not a title

They should have gone full south park though and used his title King of Canada 😀✌️
This is already sounding like a good episode for the next season of South Park between Mickey Mouse and King of Canada.
 

jpeden

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
If the state does sue Disney, will it hold up on court? I’d assume so, but this state has done things before.

Even the most conservative justice is not going to try and set a new precedent by invalidating existing contract law or arguing that a law that had yet to be signed by the Governor has the ability to invalidate a legally executed and existing contract.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom