News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

[Sirwalterraleigh]

The Reedy Creek Improvement District was established *after* Walt died.

Correct…but it was “strongly suggested” by the bothers in late 1964

 

[networkpro]

You got some mommy/no pony for your birthday issues there, friend…

Don't need any hay burners, cattle are revenue generators.

 

[mikejs78]

Correct…but it was “strongly suggested” by the bothers in late 1964

True. But the irony is that I think in the aftermath of Walt's death, FL wanted this more than Disney did at first.

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

Don't need any hay burners, cattle are revenue generators.

How about shares in the makers of Zoloft?

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

True. But the irony is that I think in the aftermath of Walt's death, FL wanted this more than Disney did at first.

They saw what it could do for a state that was still largely undeveloped at that time.

They were right x10

 

[Goofyernmost]

Walt was dead. Even As a city, it would have been a tourist attraction and developing tourism is a key part of the legal basis for the District, both in the actual legislation and in the subsequent court ruling,

Walt was dead, but his plan was not. His instructions and wishes were a front line priority and Roy knew what Walt was thinking and why. Without the city there really was no reason for RCID. Units like that are customarily set up to operate utilities but very seldom more than that and at the time I don't think that Roy had completely abandoned that idea. He did decide before he died. Remember all this is just speculation on my part but, it makes sense to me. It took a lot of alterations to the property to make a swamp a vacation kingdom.

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

If only it wasn't so true. Universal Health Care? Nahhh...but now? Republicans wouldn't dare take away Obamacare because they never had anything better and know their voters would figure out how bad it was for them to lose it in one election cycle. And I mean who was that that was trying to eradicate democracy as we know it? Oh yeah Antifa right?

..:i’m trying not to like/laugh at this

 

[networkpro]

How about shares in makers of Zoloft?

Nope, plenty of fentaynl for all...why not legalize it as well ? Things will find an equilibrium.

 

[networkpro]

If only it wasn't so true. Universal Health Care? Nahhh...but now? Republicans wouldn't dare take away Obamacare because they never had anything better and know their voters would figure out how bad it was for them to lose it in one election cycle. And I mean who was that that was trying to eradicate democracy as we know it? Oh yeah Antifa right?

See how easy it is to trigger a response? How dare they! Face it, the majority of the commentators in this thread have no standing in the politics of whatever is going on in Florida. It's all arm chair quarterbacking and posturing.

 

[mightynine]

wait…this thing is up to 218 pages?!?

I guess the moderators just cracked open a beer and said “**** it, life’s too short.”

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

I guess the moderators just cracked open a beer and said “**** it, life’s too short.”

It’s called an “outlet”

Like when a monk would
Put leeches on your head in 1462

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

See how easy it is to trigger a response? How dare they! Face it, the majority of the commentators in this thread have no standing in the politics of whatever is going on in Florida. It's all arm chair quarterbacking and posturing.

That sounds like what angry Orlando-ite would
Come up with as a “cheeky” response.

 

[Club Cooloholic]

See how easy it is to trigger a response? How dare they! Face it, the majority of the commentators in this thread have no standing in the politics of whatever is going on in Florida. It's all arm chair quarterbacking and posturing.

See the non response to my perfectly good example of people that voted against their best interest. Carry on my good man.

 

[networkpro]

That sounds like what angry Orlando-ite would
Come up with as a “cheeky” response.

Nope it's the precise reason that Steve axed the politics section. Every side believes it has some special insight or moral imperative that places it's position above all others. That's between them and their makers to be judged on.

 

[mikejs78]

Without the city there really was no reason for RCID.

Actually, there was. FL didn't have the means to build the municipal infrastructure for a theme park resort.

 

[Vegas Disney Fan]

Nope it's the precise reason that Steve axed the politics section. Every side believes it has some special insight or moral imperative that places it's position above all others. That's between them and their makers to be judged on.

Yep, both sides think the other side votes against their own interests, and both sides can provide dozens of valid examples to back their claim, but since neither side will ever convince the other side they are wrong, and more importantly since politics aren’t allowed here, probably best to stick to the approved RCID discussion.

 

[mikejs78]

Nope it's the precise reason that Steve axed the politics section. Every side believes it has some special insight or moral imperative that places it's position above all others. That's between them and their makers to be judged on.

In the Reedy Creek discussion there are objective facts. You can choose to look at them or ignore them.

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

Nope it's the precise reason that Steve axed the politics section. Every side believes it has some special insight or moral imperative that places it's position above all others. That's between them and their makers to be judged on.

Good call. So what development do you live in?

 

[Sirwalterraleigh]

In the Reedy Creek discussion there are objective facts. You can choose to look at them or ignore them.

Yeah…thank you.

This is about reedy creek and specific events. Not a presidential debate…

It’s actually fairly easy to “localize” the politics of this to just what affects Disney in this case.

But it’s always nice to see someone blanket lecture people about “no politics” by rehashing a frequent Napoleon grievance/complaint straight off Faux

 

[Club Cooloholic]

Nope it's the precise reason that Steve axed the politics section. Every side believes it has some special insight or moral imperative that places it's position above all others. That's between them and their makers to be judged on.

The precise reason he got rid of a politics discussion was because of arm chair political quarter backing? Isn't that what all political commentary is? Btw, that was NOT the reason that thread went away.....