flynnibus
Premium Member
None - but you suggest that the person has some additional protection because of their speech. They don't.What crime has been committed?
None - but you suggest that the person has some additional protection because of their speech. They don't.What crime has been committed?
Probably not. They can acquire it through eminent domain.Orange and Osceola counties would have to purchase fire equipment, fire houses, road equipment...from Disney, contract with Disney to supply services or buy and build the stuff on their own.
Like explain the law is not what opponents have claimed it is?Well that’s an interesting perspective. Let’s assume a large percentage of Disney Employees really feel under attack from this bill.
Has Disney now done enough to support these employees?
Universal Studios FL had been planning to build as early as the early 1980s. Roadblocks of county red tape was what they dealt with over the years. USF finally opened in 1990. WDW and Reedy Creek who bypassed all the red tape a few years later planned for DHS. DHS opened in 1989. Efficiency, unregulated works when red tape does not get in the way. If under Orange and Osceola counties, look for typical red tape to get in the way.
Disney currently pays taxes to RCID AND taxes to Orange and Osceola CountyThey already do. Orange and Osceola County with in the RCID is taxed at its own millage rate. All that money goes to the RCID for operating costs. If RCID is dissolved, that tax money would go to the counties, no?
I think you need to step back and consider how difficult these thread are to moderate. It is a no-win impossible situation when there are two very divided sides to every thread that is political in nature. Each time we try to let people carry on the conversation, and each time someone gets upset with comments, can't control what they say, gets angry with moderation - and so on. Please try to help and these types of threads can maybe more successful.
It's been this way for years, way before the recent events.It's difficult when Disney decided to go all in. I don't envy you your task.
This idea regarding Reedy Creek removal is pure March Madness ( Go DUKE!) without basketball. Pure and simple it is retaliation against WDW, who happens to be a big donor to causes and parties.
Corporations are able to engage in speech just like individuals. This is in no way an appropriate response to expressing dislike of legislation.Maybe. But Disney threw the first punch. Individuals can certainly disagree with any legislation. But they decided to weigh in as a company against the State of Florida. Florida Legislators took notice. And here we are.
I remember how entertaining the political forum was. I guess it got a little rough eh?It's been this way for years, way before the recent events.
What makes it difficult is when people can't be respectful to each other and discuss things like grown ups.
Were you for or against Disney pulling out of Russia?Maybe. But Disney threw the first punch. Individuals can certainly disagree with any legislation. But they decided to weigh in as a company against the State of Florida. Florida Legislators took notice. And here we are.
Yeah you can say that again.I remember how entertaining the political forum was. I guess it got a little rough eh?
I wonder, if RCID is dissolved, will they also dissolve the 17 special districts - all similar to RCID - that make up the Villages?
It was. I don't recall you adding any insight to share on passionate topics in that defunct forum.I remember how entertaining the political forum was. I guess it got a little rough eh?
Sue in federal court, claim violation of equal protection and first amendment?You know the answer. There is only one Law of Florida, they would be looking at: Chapter 1967-764, Laws of Florida, the law that created the Reedy Creek Improvement District.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.