News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I respectfully disagree completely. Disney COULD have built 4 theme parts, a ton of hotels, and a shopping district WITHOUT "RCID" as it was chartered. Any "common" special taxing district that Florida has today would have been fine! CFTOD today would have been fine! Disney deals with STRICT local and international governments every day in ALL of their other parks with no severe problems! Universal has two major parks, a ton of hotels and a shopping district..and a GIGANTIC new park...and they did it all without a Disney-style RCID in it's pocket.

Any REGULAR taxing district will be fine. RCID was only necessary for EPCOT as a true functioning "city" with several thousands of residents living there. WDW is nothing like the EPCOT city that RCID was built for.

RCID (as it was chartered) was not necessary for WDW because it was chartered for the needs of a futuristic EPCOT.

Disney and Universal have both 100% proven over and over again that RCID was\is not necessary.
Today was not 1964 along a partially built highway with nothing but a Lockheed bombing range, cattle ranches, orange groves, and fertilizer farms (which wdw was)…

They insisted on reedy creek to allow for massive terraforming and infrastructure

I think your historical perspective is off
 
Last edited:

flynnibus

Premium Member
What did he say that makes you think he wants to take Disney land and develop it?
Where do you think the District was going to facilitate all those critical tasks they wanted to address like affordable housing, services for workers, etc? And the absurd comments from the Gov about prisons was not haphazard. All of this was said knowing the District doesn't have the developable land to do any of this.

While none of it had real teeth, it's all posturing, which you now question as if it were... unsubstantiated?
 

JKick95

Active Member
What did he say that makes you think he wants to take Disney land and develop it?
Comments like this one from DeSantis today. Similar comments I feel have been made in the past.

“So we have an interest as a state in moving forward to make this region very strong. This Tourism Oversight board, and that district is a big part of that. I think that there’s going to be ways where, you know, we can do things that are in the best interest of the State of Florida, and I think Disney can be a part of that.”

I could be reading too much into it. But it just seems like they are interested in developing the land with or without Disney.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Then why do they need to change the comprehensive plan and the development agreement? To this day the board has not identified any actual issues with the comprehensive plan. The only issue they have identified is affordable housing, something already allowed throughout almost the entire district.
That’s already the worst part of the plan. Not because I oppose affordable housing…because I don’t want Florida’s problems being planted behind a hedgewall next to Coronado springs
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Where do you think the District was going to facilitate all those critical tasks they wanted to address like affordable housing, services for workers, etc? And the absurd comments from the Gov about prisons was not haphazard. All of this was said knowing the District doesn't have the developable land to do any of this.

While none of it had real teeth, it's all posturing, which you now question as if it were... unsubstantiated?
I’m not sure what you mean. The posturing was real but the teeth were not.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
Wait,...didn't we all agree that Disney had the legal and moral high ground on this and that Disney's business was in NO danger from ANY of this?
Disney always has and still does have the moral high ground in this instance, at least for anyone who doesn't approve of dictatorships and blatantly ignoring whole chunks of the Federal and Florida constitutions.

Also, I don't believe anyone said there was no danger. Many people pointed out that due to the partisan nature of the courts that it could go either way and rested almost entirely on which judge they got. It was also pointed out that no matter who "won", the ruling was all but guaranteed to be appealed by the other side but hey, continue to twist what people said to fit whatever perceived slight you feel.

Did we not clearly establish over the past two years that Disney's logo was essentially bulletproof and that any "small" amount Disney brand damage was only due to a tiny minority of small weirdo consumer groups?

Yes, I think we all agreed on this and that Disney had (and still has) nothing to fear on the public relations side. The deep love and consumer goodwill for this company is rock-solid and unwavering in 2024.
No one ever claimed they were immune from bad movies, overpricing everything and nickel and diming people to death. What they are insulated from is boycotts from small, fringe groups which is what the number of people following this fight closely who are willing to boycott would be. If that group really made that much of a difference we would see a major decline across all parks, not just a minor one at WDW.

Bottom line, not being able to build because you are fighting with the state is bad for business, an infinitesimally small group of people who care enough about this fight refusing to buy anything Disney is not.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
I’m not sure what you mean. The posturing was real but the teeth were not.
So I think you answered your own question then... When you say "What did he say that makes you think" -- Their statements and posturing.

It's not like they fear the courts throwing out their ideas.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Comments like this one from DeSantis today. Similar comments I feel have been made in the past.

“So we have an interest as a state in moving forward to make this region very strong. This Tourism Oversight board, and that district is a big part of that. I think that there’s going to be ways where, you know, we can do things that are in the best interest of the State of Florida, and I think Disney can be a part of that.”

I could be reading too much into it. But it just seems like they are interested in developing the land with or without Disney.
That doesn’t say anything about taking Disney’s land and developing it. How are they going to take Disney’s land and why?
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Comments like this one from DeSantis today. Similar comments I feel have been made in the past.

“So we have an interest as a state in moving forward to make this region very strong. This Tourism Oversight board, and that district is a big part of that. I think that there’s going to be ways where, you know, we can do things that are in the best interest of the State of Florida, and I think Disney can be a part of that.”

I could be reading too much into it. But it just seems like they are interested in developing the land with or without Disney.
Very legitimate concern…his particular ilk don’t observe guardrails in public by keeping the goals and discussion that should be private…well…private
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
At the end of the day I said this was coming several posts ago. DeSantis and crew really have no interest in keeping this fight going now considering the outcome of his political ambitions.

Disney just needs to focus on negotiating the best agreements possible so they can get back to running their parks. No more of this cat and mouse game that has been going on for the last couple of years.
Agreed. While I don't think Desantis and Disney will ever be on great terms, the end of his presidential campaign kind of took away the main driver behind his war with Disney in the first place.

Hopefully the next governor of Flordia — whether they be Republican or Democrat — is friendlier to the company. I think this feud is one of the main reasons why Walt Disney World has been so slow in announcing projects/construction plans the past couple of years, as there was so much uncertainty about the future.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Agreed. While I don't think Desantis and Disney will ever be on great terms, the end of his presidential campaign kind of took away the main driver behind his war with Disney in the first place.

Hopefully the next governor of Flordia — whether they be Republican or Democrat — is friendlier to the company. I think this feud is one of the main reasons why Walt Disney World has been so slow in announcing projects/construction plans the past couple of years, as there was so much uncertainty about the future.
That would be best…but I think we opened the Pandora’s box of wingnuts and it could get worse
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
My theory is... the back channel to DeSantis and his team finally got through and everyone started talking $$$ for Florida (and DeSantis' campers)

DeSantis' tone is obvious... this isn't something done without his direct involvement. This isn't a settlement with the district... this is a settlement with DeSantis' camp. Clearly DeSantis' comments are coming from first hand perspective of objectives and priorities.

Remember awhile back when the message was the parties wouldn't connect... yeah obviously that is old news and the power brokers, not the lawyers, finally had a meeting of the minds.

Someone should watch the political contribution spigot opening back up from Disney.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
My theory is... the back channel to DeSantis and his team finally got through and everyone started talking $$$ for Florida (and DeSantis' campers)

DeSantis' tone is obvious... this isn't something done without his direct involvement. This isn't a settlement with the district... this is a settlement with DeSantis' camp. Clearly DeSantis' comments are coming from first hand perspective of objectives and priorities.

Remember awhile back when the message was the parties wouldn't connect... yeah obviously that is old news and the power brokers, not the lawyers, finally had a meeting of the minds.

Someone should watch the political contribution spigot opening back up from Disney.
But to what end? He’s a lame duck with no clear path forward as of now…and last year went very disastrously for him. It’s hard to see what he specifically can glean from this?
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Seems to me the state clearly won. Disney has 'conceded' itself a win behind the scenes - as in the whole event is over, they've clearly regained a working dialogue and are clearly moving towards being allowed to do whatever they want developmental wise again. Of course, why shouldn't they, the state trying to destroy their golden goose made absolutely no sense.

The real losers here are Americans. Political and corporate backdealings matter more than your constitution.
The whole “constitution” thing is like a shiny object here. There are many issues with “constitutionality” in this and damn near every court proceeding.
Yep. Sad but not really all that surprising these days.
I don’t think we’ve hit the low point yet…if you want to be really depressed?
 

Chi84

Premium Member
And Disney just gave them their teeth back. Why would they not continue to pursue any of that? They can now make Beyond Big Thunder contingent on providing land for district projects.
I suppose anything is possible. But given the tenor of the governor’s remarks I don’t see any benefit to them in doing it.

What district projects? You know more about land development than I do but wouldn’t anything of that nature have to be included in the yet to be negotiated development agreements? The ones that Disney referred to as a contingency for deferring briefing in their federal suit?
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
But to what end? He’s a lame duck with no clear path forward as of now…and last year went very disastrously for him. It’s hard to see what he specifically can glean from this?
I think the personal and professional lives of the CFTOD folks being rattled affected this long term, as did the imminent prospect of them being deposed.

I don’t think it’s a coincidence this settlement occurred as all of that was happening, and the board and leadership is undergoing a lot of changes.

I mean, what is the coincidence that a GOP-leaning but longtime Disney vendor partner suddenly appears on the board as this happens?

I suspect you’ll find future hearings will be far more pragmatically focused on the core competencies of what used to be RCID.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom