lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
That's where Disney defended their position in the matter.I kind of get the "Disney denies" stuff in the beginning, and get the "Counts" at the end...but what does the "Affirmative Defense" stuff do in the middle (and I've never even heard the phrase "Equitable estoppel")?
This whole thing is turning into one big mess!
Estop is basically that you can't go back on promises. This is a case where Wikipedia can be helpful and the first example used is pretty much this case.
Estoppel - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The District is arguing that the contracts are void because the proper procedures were not followed, but they are actually the party that they allege did not follow proper procedure. They play games in their argument by using the District's two different names to make it as though different parties were involved, but legally they are one and the same entity. Contracts are supposed to be binding and you're not allowed to just get out of them because you later decide otherwise even if you did make an error. Disney is not allowed to nullify Universal Orlando's contract with Marvel even though they now own Marvel or even if they found out that Marvel did something wrong in making the deal.
Last edited: