I think they went with teal/aqua previously because it is the color of the sea and they felt they needed to choose something besides pink so that Aurora and she did not look too much alike. Easy recognizability, especially, with young children is important for Disney. Further, Ariel is not identified with a signature dress/look as she changes many times in the film (to include the fact that in part of the movie she has a tail!). So it is easiest to put here in an dress color. I like her dress the way it is and already has the "sparkles" on it that the revamp seems to be doning for all the other princesses. I say leave her dress alone. The others so far have been a great improvement though.I hesitate to denounce the new Ariel dress based on that photo, but I will say I always like her current dress.
Based on Spo0nfulofSugar's posted photo, it looks like they attempted to match the style of her pink dress much more closely... off the shoulder... puff sleeves hanging down rather than standing up... sheer sleeves covering the arms to the wrist. But they decided to keep the aqua color, which is perfectly fine with me - she is a mermaid, afterall.
Norway and the Castle for meals and in the parade. Also I believe in DL she does not meet as a "mermaid."I'm in love with Aurora's new dress! Thank god they fixed those awful shoulder things, haha. Now I'm just worried about Ariel's dress. But is Ariel ever anywhere else besides New Fantasyland?
I think they went with teal/aqua previously because it is the color of the sea and they felt they needed to choose something besides pink so that Aurora and she did not look too much alike. Easy recognizability, especially, with young children is important for Disney. Further, Ariel is not identified with a signature dress/look as she changes many times in the film.
I'm not getting how children would not be able to differentiate Ariel from Aurora if they both wore pink? Ariel is the only redhead in the bunch. You could put her in a potato sack and she would still stand out from the rest of the group.
I do agree though that finding a "signature" dress for Ariel is quite difficult because she is most recognizable in mermaid form and she did wear a few dresses in the film. I think the issue with Ariel is not that she has so many outfits in the film, but that none of the dresses she wears are terribly memorable. Keep in mind that Belle has two looks in the parks and you can still figure out who she is, whether in the ball gown or her peasant dress.
I never understood why they put Ariel in the blue/green monstrosity. It looks slightly similar to her wedding dress with a few modifications, but she still remains the only princess who does not wear her film costume. I have no idea where the inspiration for her "new" look comes from and why they decided to just make something "unique". Ariel NEVER wore anything off the shoulder. It looks like she and Jasmine has a sleepover and she stole her clothes. It would have made more sense to try to recreate the pink dress or, better yet, her peasant dress that she wore during "Kiss the Girl." I think that stands out as the most memorable dress she wears in human form.
If the below FAN could come up with looks THIS good, why can't Disney's costume department. Despite the fact Ariel is in PINK there is NO mistaking who she is.
I'm not going to dispute that she is a red head and easy to pick out, but I am just talking about Disney's thinking. There thinking is also about merchandising. They often sell items with multiple princesses and having two in pink just doesn't seem like something they want to do. I am not saying it makes sense. I'm just saying I think this is why things are what they are. Certainly lots of things Disney does does not make sense from our prospective, but they seem to or must have some rational for what they do.I'm not getting how children would not be able to differentiate Ariel from Aurora if they both wore pink? Ariel is the only redhead in the bunch. You could put her in a potato sack and she would still stand out from the rest of the group.
I do agree though that finding a "signature" dress for Ariel is quite difficult because she is most recognizable in mermaid form and she did wear a few dresses in the film. I think the issue with Ariel is not that she has so many outfits in the film, but that none of the dresses she wears are terribly memorable. Keep in mind that Belle has two looks in the parks and you can still figure out who she is, whether in the ball gown or her peasant dress.
I never understood why they put Ariel in the blue/green monstrosity. It looks slightly similar to her wedding dress with a few modifications, but she still remains the only princess who does not wear her film costume. I have no idea where the inspiration for her "new" look comes from and why they decided to just make something "unique". Ariel NEVER wore anything off the shoulder. It looks like she and Jasmine has a sleepover and she stole her clothes. It would have made more sense to try to recreate the pink dress or, better yet, her peasant dress that she wore during "Kiss the Girl." I think that stands out as the most memorable dress she wears in human form.
If the below FAN could come up with looks THIS good, why can't Disney's costume department. Despite the fact Ariel is in PINK there is NO mistaking who she is.
I love Ariel's current dress, and agree that a lot of the film designs wouldn't quite work in person. (Those sleeves!) The off the shoulder look of the new dress doesn't seem to have the right fit, and looks less regal in comparison when standing next to a dress like Belle's. Off the shoulder coupled with poofy sleeves makes it look a bit too much like an 80's prom dress! Also, the lower part of the skirt lays a bit flat, versus the fullness of her current dress.
Overall I'm liking the new designs; vast improvements in fabric choices, wig styles, etc...but poor Ariel deserves something a bit more suited to a Princess!
And in general, I think the key to trying to understand why Disney would change these dresses and colors and looks from their original movie designs, is to understand that Disney is generally more into marketing than "historical" accuracy, even when talking about their own history. Another example: Mulan was not born into royalty and did not marry into royalty, yet she is actively marketed as a Disney Princess. [editing to add...] I think the last thing in the world she wanted to be was a princess.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.