RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
IMO, Ta Lo from Shang Chi legit fits that park.Why are we talking Marvel for AK ??
Personally just because the franchise is huge doesn’t mean it needs to be inserted everywhere.
IMO, Ta Lo from Shang Chi legit fits that park.Why are we talking Marvel for AK ??
Personally just because the franchise is huge doesn’t mean it needs to be inserted everywhere.
Site that can't be named posted about wooden posts going up near the wall.It's been established that something is being built where prime's entrance was, right?
IMO, Ta Lo from Shang Chi legit fits that park.
It’s a slippery slope, but aside from GOTG, & Doctor Strange, I don’t think there are any other lucrative properties they could use. They could probably shoehorn something Doctor Strange into AK. How it would connect to Ta Lo, I’m unsure. But Ta Lo’s scenery could lend to a beautiful flume drop ride, maybe even a coaster, lord knows AK could use the capacity and I think we all know we’re long past the concept of any original attractions for the parksIt could if they used it like Pandora, but I think we all know they wouldn't -- it would be an excuse to heavily feature Shang-Chi and potentially bring in other Marvel characters that aren't contractually banned.
I think Ta Lo could work next to Everest is a one off attraction. I'd love it if it was a Shanghai Pirates style boat ride.It could if they used it like Pandora, but I think we all know they wouldn't -- it would be an excuse to heavily feature Shang-Chi and potentially bring in other Marvel characters that aren't contractually banned.
And of course, you speak for all culture. Silly us....Literally none of their films made a cultural impact this year. Their biggest success was WandaVision, everything since then has failed spectacularly. Anyone who argues this claim is in denialtown.
"Coming Summer 2025!"Still on the park maps.
Wonder if they are buying a new one as a replacement?
Game changer"Coming Summer 2025!"
Clearly a response to Epic Universe.
It doesn't need to be a whole land. A Shang-Chi dragon attraction would easily fit in the exciting land of Asia.
It's too late for that. Any new ride will be based on established, (mostly) popular, extant IP. That's a given....and then Animal Kingdom will continue its journey to being just another bland IP-backwash park, following in Big Brother Epcot's footsteps.
Complaining about IP that's a thematic fit is silly. Save the bellyaching for shoehorned IP that doesn't fit....and then Animal Kingdom will continue its journey to being just another bland IP-backwash park, following in Big Brother Epcot's footsteps.
No.With the success of Zootopia, and the upcoming Disney+ Zootopia series, AK is crying out for a land based on this IP. It's the natural fit. Disney also now owns Ice Age, which has been a highly successful series of films.
For me IP has never been a draw. IMO the best Disney rides were the original Epcot ones that had no IP attached.I don’t get the hate for IP rides but giving a c list Marvel character a ride would be so unnecessary. So many more IPs deserve a ride.
No.
Zootopia is not a natural fit for AK. It doesn’t fit the theme of the park at all.
IPs aren't the problem. IPs are allowed, they just need to be thematically appropriate. Shang Chi is thematically appropriate for a mystical animal section of DAK....and then Animal Kingdom will continue its journey to being just another bland IP-backwash park, following in Big Brother Epcot's footsteps.
No it’s not.IPs aren't the problem. IPs are allowed, they just need to be thematically appropriate. Shang Chi is thematically appropriate for a mystical animal section of DAK.
IPs aren't the problem. IPs are allowed, they just need to be thematically appropriate. Shang Chi is thematically appropriate for a mystical animal section of DAK.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.