PHOTOS - Inside the interactive indoor queue set to open in July at Dumbo

danlb_2000

Premium Member
I have no issues with the design itself. My DD will probably love playing in here.

My only curiosity like I said earlier is about how Disney plans to keep this "non-linear" queue and ride moving at pace.

Things like "will they wait for everyone or how long do you have to get in line", "what happens if you do miss your ride? get the next spin or do you 'go back to the end of the line'?", "What if someone just takes buzzer and leaves, forgetting they actually have it." (I'm sure it'll happen!).

It's a brand new style of queue for a WDW ride so I'm curious how it'll work and keep things moving smoothly.

The only way I can think this would work is that you are called to queue up a couple cycles in advance, this would solve all the problems you mention. They tested out a system like this on Rock-n-Roller Coaster a while back, but I don't recal the details of thow that one worked.
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
So now visually seeing it isn't enough info?:lol:

Listen, I wasn't expecting this to be anything uber amazing or for me at all. But I was expecting it to at least look Disney quality like the rest of the circus, not like something at a fast food location.

(And for the record, the showbuilding doesn't bother me all that much)

I am saying that two still pictures of the area aren't enough to judge this idea as a success or failure. People are complaining about the lack of interaction, how can you tell there is no interaction from two still pictures?

I normally try to stay pretty level headed in my posts and not get into these kinds of discussions, but this thread just puched me over the edge. Now that I have gotten it out of my system, I feel better.
 

MichWolv

Born Modest. Wore Off.
Premium Member
Not waiting in a switchback queue is revolutionary. Instead, kids can run around while you wait your turn to be paged. This looks awesome. This sounds awesome. Bravo Disney for taking what was arguably the worst line in all of WDW and making it one of the best. Yet you still complain...

Agree.
 

Lucky

Well-Known Member
The only way I can think this would work is that you are called to queue up a couple cycles in advance, this would solve all the problems you mention.

Exactly - and if people aren't responding to their buzzers fast enough to keep the line filled, they'll just buzz that many more people.
 

GLaDOS

Well-Known Member
I am saying that two still pictures of the area aren't enough to judge this idea as a success or failure. People are complaining about the lack of interaction, how can you tell there is no interaction from two still pictures?

I normally try to stay pretty level headed in my posts and not get into these kinds of discussions, but this thread just puched me over the edge. Now that I have gotten it out of my system, I feel better.

Oh, I dunno about the interactivity. I'm commenting on the cheap look it has.
 

Murphketeer

Member
The only way I can think this would work is that you are called to queue up a couple cycles in advance, this would solve all the problems you mention. They tested out a system like this on Rock-n-Roller Coaster a while back, but I don't recal the details of thow that one worked.

This was basically the way it was described to me. 2-3 cycles before your ride time, you will get the page. If you want to repond then you can, if you want to continue to play you can and others behind you will move ahead. As people/ groups leave, new groups will be granted access to the area.

I think these interactive queue elements are better than the ones in the Haunted Mansion line.
 

orky8

Well-Known Member
Yes, sitting in a queue waiting while my kids have fun without me and listening to the wailing of other brats around me. That sounds like one of the best queues in WDW.:rolleyes:

Just so I understand. You would rather be outside in the Florida heat stuck between two metal rails slowly trudging along for 45 minutes to an hour? You have no ability to acknowledge how being in a themed, air condition space, free to roam or sit in a corner talking to the wall, as I imagine could be the case for you, while you wait for a pager to go off, is an improvement.

But, I guess you're right, if you're not having fun, then your kid shouldn't either -- so, lets go back to the old-fashioned lines. That way, it's all even-steven and everyone is miserable. You seem like a very upbeat person...
 

MickeyPeace

Well-Known Member
If Walt were alive and waiting in this queue wouldn't he feel that things had come full circle?

He might be thinking, wouldn't it be nice if there was a place where I wouldn't be watching my children play but could join in? Oh wait, this is my world, Disney World!
What the hell is this McCrap?

Having said that, if there is one ride where this would be acceptable it's Dumbo.

Just leave all of the others alone. Sorry Mansion.
 

GLaDOS

Well-Known Member
Just so I understand. You would rather be outside in the Florida heat stuck between two metal rails slowly trudging along for 45 minutes to an hour? You have no ability to acknowledge how being in a themed, air condition space, free to roam or sit in a corner talking to the wall, as I imagine could be the case for you, while you wait for a pager to go off, is an improvement.

But, I guess you're right, if you're not having fun, then your kid shouldn't either -- so, lets go back to the old-fashioned lines. That way, it's all even-steven and everyone is miserable. You seem like a very upbeat person...

Or you know, I can spend my time bonding with my child instead of sitting there watching them have fun. I believe someone somewhere once designed a park to do away with those types of things...:zipit:

Sure the air conditioning is nice. But I can sit inside the air conditioning at my McDonald's and watch them play. We don't go to WDW for that.:wave:
 

Tom

Beta Return
I hate to say it but that looks pretty crappy. Not what I was expecting at all! It looks like the little play area at my local Westfield Mall. Hopefully there is more to it than what they are showing cause that looks like there is nothing for "kids of all ages" to do in there besides sit and listen to a 100 screaming kids run around.

I completely agree. The rest of the circus was pretty impressive, but the first thing that crossed my mind when I saw the pictures was, "That's incredibly crappy looking." I'm really, really surprised.

Good grief! It's DUMBO! It's not the Tower of Terror. It's a B attraction (or whatever) and it literally geared for children and families with toddlers. This ride is the essence of what Walt wanted in his parks - something everyone COULD ride, but wasn't necessarily geared toward adults.

So, now that they've built out a completely queueless queue, and filled it with props that are indestructible and that are familiar to children - not to mention bright and colorful and animation-like - it's "cheap" and "crappy"?

I will refrain from saying anything because someone might lash out at me. I will ask if Dumbo is stationary though because the except from the blog says that he's "flying high above" or something like that...but he looks like he might just be stationary...

I think the blog writer was referring to the real Dumbo attraction flying around outside the tent. Creative license.

So how long will ride operators wait for people to dig their kids out of the play area and report to the ride? Seems like this could really slow down things unless they call riders back to queue 1-2 'spins' before their actual turn. I also wonder if they are only going to allow entry to those with buzzers. Otherwise I could see it getting very crowded with people just wanting to get out the sun or parents who want to let their kid play while they take a break.This is why I don't really like all these "interactive" queues. Disrupts the regular queue flow by people who want to stop and play.

You will now queue in stages. They'll have the final queue outside, which are the people who are 100% ready and next to board. Then they'll have the holding pen just inside, where they'll be assembling a group. This group will have the entire time it takes for a complete Dumbo ride cycle, plus part of the load/unload time of the group in front of them.

They may even take it a third step and have a pre-holding pen, which is where they REALLY try to round everyone up. So, the holding pen would be set to move outside as soon as the live queue (Group A) starts loading the ride. Everyone from Group A is in their Dumbo's, gate closes, they open the doors and send Group B from the holding pen. Then, since they've been gradually collecting people from Group C, they'll let Group C into the holding pen and lock them up until Group B starts boarding.

AND, they'll be doing this constantly, and likely in alternating fashion, for both spinners. It will LITERALLY cut the original wait time in half, and will be like Haunted Mansion when both stretch rooms are running. You'll never stand still for more than the duration of one ride cycle.

And no, they should not let people into the building unless they have a pager and are going to ride UNLESS they're part of a "group with needs" or a "baby swap". This should in no way become a place to chill.

And if you miss your turn, they can reset the pager and put you in the next available group with space. Piece of cake.


I don't know, with 2 small children, my first reaction was that this is the greatest thing I've ever seen! I think it looks much more fun and well done than a local mall play area by miles, the lights, the burning building, etc. I guess I'll be in the minority, but this looks miles above what I was expecting. I guess I was expecting a few touch screens in a wide open room.

I daresay, I like it. It's simple and small-scale, and I believe my kids (aged 3 and 5) would go nuts for it, at least for 15 minutes or so -- just enough time to make the queue a breeze instead of a hassle. Given the amount of space and the fact that this area is geared toward toddlers, I wasn't really expecting anything more elaborate than what I see in the pictures.

These two posts are probably the only two in this thread, so far, that actually matter. These are parents of children who are interested in riding Dumbo as a family. Literally speaking, the opinions of THIS demographic are the ONLY ones that matter. Nobody else's opinion in this thread (including mine, but I'm not posting an opinion) matters, because Dumbo is not designed for teens or young adults or seniors. It's designed for young kids and their families. If this new system make it so that those families are less stressed and enjoy their time in the parks more.....SUCCESS! Period.


Hmmm...first impression isn't all that great. As already stated, looks like nothing more than your typical mall playground. Apart from the waiting benches, I didn't see anything in those pics that would appeal to anyone over the age of five. And I hope there is some sound absorbing material in the ceiling or that tent, when filled with screaming children, is going to make Pooh's queue seem downright serene.

Regarding the bold part...who cares???? Do you have children age 5 and under? If not, your vote really doesn't count. Honestly. You are not the target demographic for this ride and/or queue system.


My worry is the tent area looks pretty small and cramped. When this concept was first unveiled, it was misleading the way they said "and guess what? No queue!". Seems to me you'll probably be waiting more time to enter the tent then you'll spend in the tent before your ride. At least it would appear to have to be this way to avoid overwhelming congestion inside. I already have a headache thinking about how this will look and sound when it's full of children:zipit:

Have you ever stood in the HM queue when both stretch rooms were operating? If so, you have first hand experience that this system works ideally. The Stretch Rooms would represent the Dumbo Spinners. The entry foyer and end of the queue represent the time spent in the tent.

The comparison I'm making is that with two rooms/spinners running on a calculated cycle, the ride is virtually never at a point where it's not loading or advancing guests. Dumbo is going to chew through crowds. And the tent is sized such that it will hold a few hundred people, easily. Sure, if it gets REALLY crowded, there will be a queue to get into the tent, based purely on Building Code Occupancy Limits (look for a sign posted somewhere inside the tent indicating the max # of people permitted).

As for the noise and awfulness of happy children, don't go if you don't like it. I don't like that environment, so I don't go to Chuck-e-Cheese. If I had kids, or was wanting to go with friends or family who had kids, I'd go as a courtesy, and know in advance that it's going to be nutso in there. Deal with it for a half hour while all those parents have an opportunity to relax in a queueless queue for a few minutes.

I am usually pretty tolerant on the rampant negativity on these boards, but this is just ridiculous. I can't believe people are condemning this after seeing just two pictures. As to the size of the queue, I have to think it's bigger then it appears in these pictures.

You really can't believe people are condemning this already? C'mon, you've been here long enough.

I guess they could have gone with the alternative and allowed you to stand outside in the heat while you go back and forth on concrete switchbacks. This is something that they didn't need to do and in my mind blows away waiting outside for an hour (especially if you have little kids). Ask parents with kids that are the target for this ride and I bet that 9/10 or more will be thrilled that this is now available.

Exactly. The target demographic's voice is the ONLY one that matters in this case. Disney did not build this ride or come up with this type of queue for all of us, just some of us. And the ones outside that target audience need to think about why they're riding Dumbo. Is it to make someone else (i.e. a kid) happy? If so, that should be priority #1.

Its stuff like this that makes me go to Disneyland Resort now instead of WDW. :wave:

As always, thanks for the high quality contribution.

Definitely. But even Rasulo was hyping this as some revolutionary breakthrough back in '09 when it was announced.

If you think about it...this IS revolutionary. I mean, the coolness has worn off since 2009 since we saw it being tested at RnRC and have been hypothesizing about it for 3 years, but it's still novel.

The entire concept is that you forget you're WAITING. For nearly every human, if you're entertained or distracted, you lose track of time. This is a major step toward easing tension - especially for those families with little ones who are typically just stuck standing in a 95-degree queue for 45 minutes. Now, if they want, they can just park their butts on the floor in an air conditioned building, OR let the kids bang around and play with semi-interactive, yet highly entertaining to a 5-year-old, games.

Not exactly what I was expecting. I was thinking more along the lines of Innoventions or the SSE post show with a circus theme, not a playground.

Not for something like Dumbo. The ultimate goal, with Dumbo 2.0, is that your wait will SIGNIFICANTLY decrease compared to Dumbo 1.0. And since it's their first opportunity to try the queueless queue, why throw hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of high-tech toys into a room filled with kids and families? This is exactly what it needs to be...a room filled with distractions that require no long-term commitment and are indestructible. Success.
 

Ciciwoowoo

Well-Known Member
As the Mom of a 2 year old, I approve of the new concept!

I'm sure there is more to it; they are just showing a teaser. The lighting isn't very good, but again, there is still another month's worth of work to do.

To those who worry about the screaming kids playing, get over it! The Magic Kingdom, and particularly Fantasyland, is for kids. Kids have lots of pent up energy and will need somewhere to get rid of it. The idea that there is a play area to enjoy instead of waiting in line is fantastic!
 

orky8

Well-Known Member
Or you know, I can spend my time bonding with my child instead of sitting there watching them have fun. I believe someone somewhere once designed a park to do away with those types of things...:zipit:

Sure the air conditioning is nice. But I can sit inside the air conditioning at my McDonald's and watch them play. We don't go to WDW for that.:wave:

I'm sorry, I just don't understand what you are saying. This is the line. Not a ride. Instead of waiting in normal switchback, you can now explore or just let your child run around. If you really, truly bonded with your child in that 45 minute switchback, then you can still bond, but now indoors in a themed environment. Most parents struggled to keep their children, especially young children, entertained for those 45 minutes. And you're accusations that this looks like McDonalds are probably disengenuous. Especially based on the two pictures we have.

You go to WDW to ride Dumbo (or at least, in this instance). You used to wait in the Florida heat, in a slow moving line, now you wait in an air-conditioned, themed environment, where you can roam about. And yet, you still complain...
 

bunnyman

Well-Known Member
Complain, complain, and complain, is just all anyone can do today. The old Dumbo ride had a brutal waiting area. You just stood there and moved every few minutes when they reloaded the holding pen. As an adult waiting with small kids over the years, this ride was high on our list of one's to avoid because the kids hated the very, very slow wait. At least with any type of indoor waiting area you aren't totally stuck standing in one place on line, and the kids can move around. I'll withhold judgment on what the details are inside, but I do applaud them on trying something new. As someone said earlier, it is after all just a queue!
 

bhodge

Member
Don't get in the line

Don't like it don't ride it - I agree with those saying that the complaining and negativity is ridiculous. I whole heartedly agree that a lot of WDW has slipped. A lot is not the way I remember it being, but COME ON. You try things, you experiment and you look at ways to enhance or at least change the guest experience. I dont know how many of the complainers have kids, but the people pointing out that it is an attraction design for kids have hit the nail on the head. What did you want? The guest experience is changing - guest expectations are changing and the context that people function in is different. I don;t like that we are an over-stimulation driven society, but we are and it AINT CHANGING. My hats off to Disney for looking for creative ways to function within this stimulation and technology driven society. They can't change the fact the people now feel they HAVE to have something going on every minute of their lives. They are simply reacting to it in a way that impacts their bottom line - that is what they do They are a business. There to offer entertainment and make money.
 

JenniferS

When you're the leader, you don't have to follow.
@edwardtc - That was easily the best collection of responses I have ever read on this site. The Mom should have closed the thread after your replies. There is nothing left to be said.
Well done.
 

Tom

Beta Return
Oh, I dunno about the interactivity. I'm commenting on the cheap look it has.

It looks great.....especially in the eyes of a 5-year-old, who won't be JUDGING it while he's running around and enjoying some activity instead of being herded toward slaughter like the rest of the queues on property.

If Walt were alive and waiting in this queue wouldn't he feel that things had come full circle?

He might be thinking, wouldn't it be nice if there was a place where I wouldn't be watching my children play but could join in? Oh wait, this is my world, Disney World!
What the hell is this McCrap?

Having said that, if there is one ride where this would be acceptable it's Dumbo.

I truly believe Walt would approve of this. It's the epitome of his reason for building DL. Everyone in the entire family is having fun, together, in a safe environment.

Or you know, I can spend my time bonding with my child instead of sitting there watching them have fun. I believe someone somewhere once designed a park to do away with those types of things...:zipit:

Sure the air conditioning is nice. But I can sit inside the air conditioning at my McDonald's and watch them play. We don't go to WDW for that.:wave:

You would really bond with your children more as you shuffle through the cattle call type queues on property than you could if you were able to just sit down in the corner of a big air conditioned room (like waiting for Hall of Presidents or American Adventure) while you wait? There's no requirement to play games. You can just plop down and enjoy the AC.....and have some less stressful bonding.

As the Mom of a 2 year old, I approve of the new concept!

I'm sure there is more to it; they are just showing a teaser. The lighting isn't very good, but again, there is still another month's worth of work to do.

To those who worry about the screaming kids playing, get over it! The Magic Kingdom, and particularly Fantasyland, is for kids. Kids have lots of pent up energy and will need somewhere to get rid of it. The idea that there is a play area to enjoy instead of waiting in line is fantastic!

See, you get it! But again, you are the target audience, so you would!
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
You really can't believe people are condemning this already? C'mon, you've been here long enough.

Yeah, you are right, I should know better. People have said they won't set foot in Avatarland and they know even less about it then this.

BTW, great post!
 

hokielutz

Well-Known Member
As usual, I will reserve judgement until the final product opens. Two pictures do not show how the queue concept will work.

At first glance... I love how they are bringing parts of the movie to life in a Big top setting.
I would be most concerned about the wear and tear on everything that kids will be climbing on.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom