News PHOTOS - Cinderella Castle at the Magic Kingdom to receive enhancements this summer

tirian

Well-Known Member
Frozen has wonderful art direction, but it’s essentially an Efteling attraction with Disney IP. Yet its “storyline” is dull, corporate, and uninspiring, and of course it’s in the wrong park. ;)

@yensidtlaw1969 I’m quoting myself because I realized another point of discussion.

Have today’s WDI/Parks-Resorts-Plastic Toys projects become the new Walt Disney Production movies c.1970s?

During the ‘70s and early ‘80s, most of the company’s movie output wasn’t completely bad, but it was mediocre. For every Rescuers or Great Mouse Detective, there was a Boatniks or Condorman. But they also made Pete’s Dragon, Bedknobs and Broomsticks, The Black Cauldron, Freaky Friday, and other movies that were just kinda okay.

It’s not a gleaming moment in their company’s history, and we all know how it led to Eisner-Wells.

Are we seeing this played out again with WDI? Most of the decisions aren’t outright awful like the DCA era, but they also don’t reach the Imagineering heights of the ‘60s–‘90s. Today’s WDI is mediocre with a few hits here and there—just like WDP films in the ‘70s—just kinda okay.

The rose gold/tan/orange-ish castle is the latest example.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
@yensidtlaw1969 I’m quoting myself because I realized another point of discussion.

Have today’s WDI/Parks-Resorts-Plastic Toys projects become the new Walt Disney Production movies c.1970s?

During the ‘70s and early ‘80s, most of the company’s movie output wasn’t completely bad, but it was mediocre. For every Rescuers or Great Mouse Detective, there was a Boatniks or Condorman. But they also made Pete’s Dragon, Bedknobs and Broomsticks, The Black Cauldron, Freaky Friday, and other movies that were just kinda okay.

It’s not a gleaming moment in their company’s history, and we all know how it led to Eisner-Wells.

Are we seeing this played out again with WDI? Most of the decisions aren’t outright awful like the DCA era, but they also don’t reach the Imagineering heights of the ‘60s–‘90s. Today’s WDI is mediocre with a few hits here and there—just like WDP films in the ‘70s—just kinda okay.

The rose gold/tan/orange-ish castle is the latest example.
That's an interesting observation, and a parallel I hadn't considered before. I think it is fair to say that projects like Frozen Ever After, Mermaid, Runaway Railway, and even Na'vi River Journey are sort of equivalent to the films of that era. There will be people who grow up loving them, for sure, and they're not entirely without their endearing qualities, but you can tell they're bunting.

I had hope that Rise of the Resistance would be a watershed moment, much like The Little Mermaid was in ushering in the Disney Renaissance, though I suspect the pandemic has probably put the kibosh on any plans that had the potential to fulfill that sort of destiny. And even then, as we said earlier, Rise is built on the back of someone else's success from 40 years ago. Mermaid (the film, and decidedly NOT the ride) stands much more on its own two feet, ironically. Of course Hans Christian Andersen lent a hand, but I think it's fair to say the success of that film has more to do with the music, characters, retooled story, and visuals that Disney built on top of that than what they took from him. Much less the case with Rise, which follows a blueprint pretty literally (to thrilling effect).

It makes you wonder what it'll take for things to turn the corner. The answer in the 80's seemed to be New Management. I can't imagine the New Management we've just come into is going to usher in an era like The Disney Renaissance in any facet of the company, especially Imagineering.

Let's hope I'm wrong?
 

Father Robinson

Well-Known Member
There's really no arguing that the final product is not what was promised. This is almost giving me the fail-vibes of when Disneyland painted Space Mountain brown. I'm curious to see what public opinion is and if this ends up being a very short lived color scheme.
Hopefully VERY short lived!!!
 

MagicHappens1971

Well-Known Member
Can't find an official source from Disney. The 189' measurement is from the moat's surface. I'd assume Tokyo's is the same. Comparing your photos, it looks like the majority of the extra height is in the very base in WDW. Though all the "parts" are there in both your shots, the castles look significantly different in terms of how they are positioned in relations to each other.
This is a graphic included in an interview with Bob Iger from The Hollywood Reporter.
THR-fea-disney-castles.jpg
 

Otamin

Well-Known Member
Anyone who’d ever studied color theory could’ve looked at that concept art and said the colors would be harsh in the Floridian sunlight. Remember when Disney used to brag how when they built the Grand Floridian, they had carefully selecting the correct off-white to appear gleaming white in the sun?
Definitely. They certainly used to care more about it.

If they wanted to add some gold elements to the castle for the 50th, fine, but the way they’ve approached every aspect of this has been wrong. Subtlety was what was needed, not this.

Actually looks way better from ground up.

That’s an old photo with the colours altered.
 

Giss Neric

Well-Known Member
Definitely. They certainly used to care more about it.

If they wanted to add some gold elements to the castle for the 50th, fine, but the way they’ve approached every aspect of this has been wrong. Subtlety was what was needed, not this.

That’s an old photo with the colours altered.
Yes, it's an old altered photo. I'm just showing the perspective from ground up cause most likely it will look like that anyways.
 

TJJohn12

Well-Known Member
This is a graphic included in an interview with Bob Iger from The Hollywood Reporter.
View attachment 480450
I’ve used that one when scale modeling before, but I take it with a grain of salt and don’t consider it an “official” source because I assume it was created by HR’s graphics department and not WDC.
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
That's an interesting observation, and a parallel I hadn't considered before. I think it is fair to say that projects like Frozen Ever After, Mermaid, Runaway Railway, and even Na'vi River Journey are sort of equivalent to the films of that era. There will be people who grow up loving them, for sure, and they're not entirely without their endearing qualities, but you can tell they're bunting.

I had hope that Rise of the Resistance would be a watershed moment, much like The Little Mermaid was in ushering in the Disney Renaissance, though I suspect the pandemic has probably put the kibosh on any plans that had the potential to fulfill that sort of destiny. And even then, as we said earlier, Rise is built on the back of someone else's success from 40 years ago. Mermaid (the film, and decidedly NOT the ride) stands much more on its own two feet, ironically. Of course Hans Christian Andersen lent a hand, but I think it's fair to say the success of that film has more to do with the music, characters, retooled story, and visuals that Disney built on top of that than what they took from him. Much less the case with Rise, which follows a blueprint pretty literally (to thrilling effect).

It makes you wonder what it'll take for things to turn the corner. The answer in the 80's seemed to be New Management. I can't imagine the New Management we've just come into is going to usher in an era like The Disney Renaissance in any facet of the company, especially Imagineering.

Let's hope I'm wrong?
A “thumbs-up” doesn’t seem strong enough, but the heart eyes are too much. Imagine I applauded you. ;)
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
This is a graphic included in an interview with Bob Iger from The Hollywood Reporter.
View attachment 480450
Yes, it’s also in official Imagineering books, but since I’m not at home to crack one open and quote the numbers, I didn’t chime in.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
I know others have mentioned this, but it does seem like they were meant to apply a coat of lighter color to create depth and that gradient effect that we see (where they try to mimic an aged/weathered effect). When I look at the lower/darker areas of the concept art, it looks like the same shade they painted the entire castle with.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
found on instagram, looks much better here than previous photos we’ve seen of it inside the park


That does look much better than some of the other photos because the pink looks significantly paler. It still doesn't look nearly as good as the colors used a couple of decades ago, but it's not hideous like it's seemed in other pictures. Still won't really be able to tell without seeing it in person though; too reliant on camera settings etc.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom