So you all agree MB influences your decision on Pixar Pier. Lame.
I like TSMM, but I agree with this. Just as I like the original Star Tours, but I hate what it did to the rest of Tomorrowland.Real talk: Toy Story Midway Mania is what broke the original theme. Shifting to Pixar Pier is just a dramatic over-correction for that problem.
Quite evident the theming is better. Asking for storytelling when Disney already provided the backstory is even more lame.So you think Pixar Pier is “better themed.” Lame.
Quite evident the theming is better. Asking for storytelling when Disney already provided the backstory is even more lame.
Quite evident the theming is better. Asking for storytelling when Disney already provided the backstory is even more lame.
Interesting thought, though I wonder if there was really much of a theme to break before Midway Mania came along.Real talk: Toy Story Midway Mania is what broke the original theme. Shifting to Pixar Pier is just a dramatic over-correction for that problem.
We get that. Pixar Pier is crap. We re comparing one structure to another or one sign to another and saying which one we think looks better. I think anyone that has eyes should be able to say what they think looks better. I guess it’s the word “upgrade” that you take issue with. The land is obviously a downgrade as a whole from a thematic standpoint. But If I walk by the Lamplight Lounge and that sign makes me happier than the previous signage and is more aesthetically pleasing to me then that particular sign is an upgrade for me right?
When you re walking by the sign you’re not going to like it any less because it’s disconnected from aesthetics of Pixar as a brand. Let’s not act as if aesthetics are not a huge part of the theme park experience and probably more important than theme. Obviously when everything is in perfect harmony is best.
“Form ever follows function.”It may not be better themed or even themed at all. But, it's better decorated.
We get that. Pixar Pier is crap. We re comparing one structure to another or one sign to another and saying which one we think looks better...
Here is where one could take issue on such a comparison... It's utterly disingenuous.
It could be argued that Pixar Pier did elevate specific architectural elements throughout the Pier section i.e. Lamplight Lounge, Pixar Promenade, Bing Bong's Sweet Stuff etc. However, the design choices made for the remodeling of the Pier were shallow, contrived and pretentious. Walt Disney Imagineering has openly admitted on wanting Pixar Pier to emulate Tokyo DisneySea quality conveyance. Not in conjunction of comprehensive storyline, established placemaking and layered urban design that of which American Waterfront and Cape Cod does, but in terms of architectural finishes and embellishments Toyville Trolly Park has.
Then a counter argument could be, well Toyville Trolly Park is meant to portray a classic seaside amusement park; Disney wants to convey that stylistic finish onto Pixar Pier. That's fine until one understands that Toyville Trolly Park is meant to be modeled ostensibly after Luna Park on Coney Island, as it should, because that would make it a coherent subsection of the New York based American Waterfront. All of which have nothing to do with a California based seaside pier in a California themed park.
Real talk: Toy Story Midway Mania is what broke the original theme. Shifting to Pixar Pier is just a dramatic over-correction for that problem.
Right. This is what I tried to sum up with "Pixar Pier is crap." Not sure what it has to do with the rest of what i said though.
Pardon, for I should have expanded further.
Pixar Pier's new aesthetics, while visually grabbing at first sight, does nothing to sustain one's attention once passed the surface. It fails because instead of solidifying on a concrete concept accompanied with committed execution, it relies on pastel paint schemes, disconnecting architectural styles, oversized statues and props and a plethora of intellectual property from a computer animation studio in the hopes of connecting it altogether. The new changes only further exacerbate an identity crisis that has plagued the area since its inception 17 years ago and no amount of DisneySea inspired copulas can mask it.
You're right. The Pier section of this park has always been problematic but what good do these newly applied stylistic enhancements do other than be slight cosmetic improvements when its underlying issues still and have always been foundational?
It's all merely superficial and nothing fundamental.
Improvements & Only Good Things from Pixar Pier (according to @Disneylover152)
seems like anything would fit within a seaside Pier and still be within theme. All we really need is the fish smell and the overflowing trash bins.
View attachment 326227View attachment 326229View attachment 326230View attachment 326231
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.