WannaGoNow
Active Member
Do you have any idea what 2,000 full relocation packages cost? $50 million, easily.
But you're right, Disney did this for no discernable financial benefit whatsoever
Why, yes, I am very familiar with relocation packages. International ones, even.
Sr. Execs will be given white glove housing assistance and other perks, but the lower down the position, the less incentives will offered. And I’m doubtful the bulk of people are Directors or above.
Also, I’m confused. You’re arguing that Disney is spending $50M and that’s a financial benefit?
They’re moving the people because a) Disney is all about synergy, and they apparently feel Orlando would provide more synergy (and thus operational cost savings) than Glendale, where the Creative Campus is filled to bursting, and Anaheim is also out of room, with Disney looking to turn offices into additional resort space and b) Josh D’Amaro most recently came from Orlando and he probably thinks highly of execs he left behind. And yes, they will eventually save money on salaries, because Disney will adjust for cost of living.
Disney re-orgs on a regular basis. The only constant at Disney corporate is changing how, who and where people report.
The one factor not taken into account is that employees - especially engineers and other tech types - are compensated commiserate to their cost of living. Which is why Silicon Valley is still much sexier than Florida (and it’s only 73 degrees in San Jose today). Not that Silicon Valley doesn’t have its deep problems, but acquiring talent is not one of them.I think this is slightly outdated thinking. Florida is a lot sexier now than it used to be.
I also think you're missing that California keeps a lot of people away, too. I know I'd never move to a place where I'd need $2 million to buy a decent four bedroom house within 30 minutes of my office.
I think you're NET correct, it's easier to get talent to California than Florida. But I don't think it's especially drastic.
Last edited: