on a journey to capture crisp night pics...

disneygirl76

Carey Poppins - Nanny and Disney Enthusiest
Original Poster
If you're looking to spend more money, I'd get a tripod. Honestly, you can get great night shots with the equipment you already have. It's just a matter of learning to use it.

I learned photography via Understanding Exposure along with an entry level Nikon, a tripod, wireless remote, and a kit lens. That is plenty.

I have a light weight portable one but it is still something to carry (about 2 feet long when collapsed) and I have one of those gorilla ones. i just am so afraid it will fall with my camera on it. It is so small. Have you used the gorilla one before?
 

ddbowdoin

Well-Known Member
I have a light weight portable one but it is still something to carry (about 2 feet long when collapsed) and I have one of those gorilla ones. i just am so afraid it will fall with my camera on it. It is so small. Have you used the gorilla one before?

well, they do make a gorilla pod version for DSLR's but no... I have no experience with them
 

NowInc

Well-Known Member
I have used a gorilla pod many times, and although they CAN support a DSLR, I would say do so with extreme caution. It all depends on body size/weight, lens size/weight, as well as the surface you're attaching it to. I stopped bringing mine places mostly because although I would use it and my rig would SEEM stable, I would have to keep my hands hovering around it JUST IN CASE..as sometimes it did topple over.

Also...Night shots ARE possible to get without a tripod as long as you have decent glass (and a little know-how).

For example..I went to the house of mouse this last week and one of my main goals was to get some good night shots. I played around with settings, and eventually came up with some decent results. Could they have been better? of course. But..I also only brought a low end DSLR (D3100 to be exact..on purpose as I wanted a challenge), and a "moderately" priced lens - http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-55-200mm-4-5-6G-Vibration-Reduction/dp/B000O161X0 .

My first HUGE suggestion would be to learn from others. The easiest way to do this is to go on Flickr, and see shots that you like, and then look at their exif data (you can do that within flickr). Check out the F-Stops, Shutter Speeds, ISO settings, etc. I do this a lot and take notes..and from that I came up with some ideas that I decided to try on my trip.

So basically what I did was first and foremost, raise that ISO up. Anything around 1600-3200 worked (3200 had more noise but a good perk of Nikon is that the photo "noise" looks more natural than that of canon). Second, forget about auto focus most of the time. It takes too long to "lock in"..so manual is the way to go. It may seem annoying at first, but once you get the hang of it, it becomes second nature. Third - Shutter priority mode. Yes...manual WOULD be better, but I god some good results with setting my shutter speeds around 100th of a second. Pictures come out too dark? Raise the shutter speed a little. Don't do it too much as then yes..you WILL need a tripod. If you aren't do long exposures (longer shutter speeds), keep the F stop as low as you can get it. Having a Vibration Reduction lens (I forgot the term it is called for Canon..but they have it too) helps a TON. Results?

On a "ride" (ok..so tiki room isnt a ride..but its a dark show):


Walt Disney World Trip - June 2012 by DreGGs, on Flickr

Outside shot:


Walt Disney World Trip - June 2012 by DreGGs, on Flickr

All that was needed after the shots was a BIT of touchups in Lightroom (raise the exposure a smidge, boost the saturation, maybe bump up the shadow details)..and vuala! Are they awesome pro-shots? Nope. But for a handheld "quick" unplanned shot...I'd say they are acceptable.

Hope all of this helps.
 

ddbowdoin

Well-Known Member
with relatively fast glass it's doable... especially if your images are simply bound for the net. If you don't plan on printing anything large then finer details won't be that noticeable. I like the suggestion of checking flickr, also check out 500px which reflects the same metadata. With lower end cameras there is only so much you can do with HIGH ISO, the grain becomes distracting and takes away from your image. Again though, if its purely for personal work then I wouldn't fret too much.
 

Allen C

Well-Known Member
disneygirl76: I agree with most of what's been said here. You can get nice night shots at Disney without a tripod but the trade-off would be image noise because of the high ISO's that you would be using when shooting hand-held. I'm in the low ISO - sturdy tripod camp for night time shots.
If bringing a tripod is not feasible for you then I suggest looking at the Pocket Pod Camera Bean Bag:
http://www.amazon.com/Pocket-Adjustable-Camera-Support-System/dp/B001B02ERU
There are numerous places at Disney where you can find a fairly sturdy surface where you can place this and set up your shot. Trash cans are my favorite for this. A remote shutter release would also help.
Have fun!
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom