I know this debate will just go in circles, buuut one last time:
So what you are saying is Universal is going towards doing thus more often while Disney is getting harder to find recent examples?
We already acknowledge that Galaxy's Edge and Diagon are similar.
No, I'm not saying this at all. Universal has ONLY ever once gone all in, and it's with Diagon Alley (Gringotts extended queue aside). Disney has many recent examples and many decades-old examples as well. Universal has a lot to prove with Epic but with the shortcuts taken with the DK coaster, as well as Mario Kart also missing the mark as an attraction that delivers what people want out of the IP, I believe we should anticipate Epic with cautious optimism rather than blind praise that it will be the most immersive and amazing theme park ever.
Universal has an extended cover area that was designed to only be used when the wait nears 3 hours. You might walk through it due to bad operations, but that is a different topic altogether.
Not sure why you guys keep suggesting this area is rarely used. The indoor queue only holds 30-45 minutes worth. I have been through at least a little bit of this outdoor queue about half of all the times I've ever ridden Gringotts.
Universal is a resort best at fitting and willing a way to limited real estate. They have much more cause to squeeze efficiency of curtesy and safety. They also habe half the resources or less in general.
Enclosing that extended queue to make it an extension of the bank building would have taken up the same amount of space. This is exactly why Universal receives this kind of criticism. To go all-in on immersion for a land but not do the sliiiightest bit more to ensure the immersion isn't broken with backstage infrastructure views in half of the land's main attraction's queue is just odd.
Not sure where you’re getting “half the resources” from?
Yet as soon as they got land, they are filling most of it with immersion lands. Three pretty solid ones. And others that are still esthetically greater than most oher resorts.
It's undoubtedly going to be a very nice looking park. But if the DK Coaster having several obvious weaknesses is any indication, we should at least anticipate there being more "hmm, why didn't they do a little more here?" moments around the park
I don't see them not going 100 percent all in on anything. Particularly when over 200 tree forest was made to.ckver whenever they can. It is not like they left tje show building as is or go away green.
So why not do a little more? A little bit more would have put Hagrid's on the thematic immersive coaster level of the all-time greats like Big Thunder Mountain. Why not do it? At that price tag, how much more would some actual thematic touches on the building have really added to the budget?
Ever ride the WDW RR or walk the Tomorrowland path? No excuses for plenty of things at WDW.
I would even say the umberella extended queue at Guardians of The Galaxy fits into that.
So let's not act like it is worlds better in current philosophy over at WDW.
Again, Disney is not free of this criticism but they have far more examples of doing it completely right throughout their history.