I apologize in advance for any typos, Im doing this from mobile.
@Basketbuddy101
Great job on your concept this challenge! Let's start with what I liked. Neil Patrick Harris would be a FANTASTIC host for this kind of show. He'd definitely add some charm to the show. I love the poster, but what's the point of having those two "ears" on Neil's leg?
I also really liked your slogan. While I loved your idea, there were a few flaws. First, I don't really think that the name "Imagineer Me" has any connection to the theme or the format of the show. It just seems liked you created a catchy name than would look nice on promotional posters. Also, your basic format and theme was rather simple, which could have worked if done right. But I think in this case, it didn't work to your advantage. This brings me to my other point. Four episodes per challenge is a very large amount of time for only one challenge. With such a simple format, 25 episodes would really drag on in my opinion. I think that having a maximum of two episodes per challenge would have worked much better with Blue Sky and Production in one episode and and Presentation and Judging in the next. That would make the show much more exciting, in my opinion. Next, you never specified how long an episode would be and how often they would air. 30 minutes? 1 hour? 2 hours? Once a week? Three times a week? You really never said.
My one main nitpick however is that you really didn't dive into any twists. With such a simple, plain format, twists would really be needed to make the show more exciting, but the only one that you mentioned was the "Triple Threat Challenge" which was only a sentence hidden within a paragraph. With 4 episodes per challenge, hardly any twists and a very simple format, I have to say that your show could get boring at points.
Creativity: 6/10 While your idea was somewhat unique, it really didn't have any "wow" factor that would make me want to watch. I'd probably only watch because it has to do with imagineering.
Detail: 9/10 Even though you missed some key ideas like how long and episode is or how often episodes air, the rest of your proposal was very detailed.
Realism: 6/10 It's not very realistic in my opinion to drag one challenge into 4 episodes. While this might provide a more relaxed pace, reality shows aren't meant to be slow, they're supposed to hit on high points while providing just enough information to keep things exciting.
Presentation: 8/10 Your posters and images were great and everything was organized. Nothing special, but it wasn't bad either.
Total: 29/40
@DisneyManOne
Good job in this Power of Veto competition DMO! Let's start with the good. I like the simpler format, but unlike
@Basketbuddy101, there were just enough twists and proper formatting to keep things exciting. Like Neil Patrick Harris, I think that Tom Bergeron is a natural choice for this kind of show. Now for the bad. I'm very disappointed, to be honest. All you did was pull your League of Dreamers off the shelf and throw in some twists, some of which we've already seen on these boards in competitions like The Creator Games. While your competition on the boards is creative in itself, it's not exactly creative for this challenge, which wanted you to create an all new competition for television. All you did was take the easy way out. While this is the case, I do think, however, that the format works well. There wasn't that much detail, so that left me wondering about little things that you never mentioned like how often episodes air and how long they are (similar to @Basketbuddy). Unlike @Basketbuddy however, you chose a reasonable amount of episodes (I think it was 12?). Finally, the fact that there aren't losers makes me question the amount of suspense in the show. Having someone be eliminated and out of the running really raises the stakes.
Creativity: 4/10 There really wasn't much new material in your proposal, most of the things that were in your concept we had seen before.
Detail: 6/10 Not much detail as well, but the things that you did dive into were described well.
Realism: 8/10 While you didn't do as well in other categories, this was your main selling point. I can really see your show happening.
Presentation: 5/10 very bare, there really wasn't much to it.
Total: 23/40
@mickeyfan5534
I really enjoyed this concept. There wasn't that much that I didn't like about it. I really enjoyed the faster paced format, with one challenge per episode. While the different challenges for each episode weren't the most creative, I could really see an imagineering using these prompts. I also realyl loved the name and slogan. Very catchy and memorable. One thing, however, is that John Lasseter is so busy with his actual job, I doubt that he would be able to host a full-time reality show.
Creativity: 7/10 Not the
most creative, but I found it one of the more exciting proposals for this challenge.
Detail: 7/10 Not the most detailed, but there was enough there for me to get the gist.
Realism: 7/10 I don't see John Lasseter being a host, but everything else I could see happening.
Presentation: 6/10 Like
@DisneyManOne, there really wasn't much to the presentation.
Total: 27/40
@IDInstitute
Fantastic project this challenge IDI! Let's start with what I liked. I like the name and slogan, simple but interesting at the same time. Then way you described the reason why a simpler format is needed was perfect, really lets me realize that you thought about the details. I LOVED the added details of the time, episode length, and how it's filmed at DHS. Really nice additions. I really liked the idea of the conestants living at Golden Oaks, really creative! I also really enjoyed the detailed challenge outline. Now for the nitpicks. While I like the idea of a live studio audience, I'm not sure that replacing Frozen's successful sing along would be the best business move. Frozen is extremely popular and there are tons of other spaces where a theater could have been built. Also, on the image on the last page, the "Walt Disney" blended in with the background color, but that's a minor concern. Finally, I really don't see John Lasseter as being a host for some reason.
Creativity: 8/10 Truly creative things like having a setting and live audience made this concept really stand out.
Detail: 9.5/10 there we're details after details in your proposal, it was all really thought out.
Realism: 6/10 While I could see some things happening, things like replacing Frozen and having John Lasseter as a host don't seem very realistic.
Presentation: 9/10 VERY clean and organized presentation with the site, well done!
Total: 32.5/40
@Flippin'Flounder
Good concept this challenge! Lets start with what what enjoyed. I liked the name and I think that Tony Baxter would make a great host. But to be honest, im very disappointed and I apologize if i sound harsh here. There was no detail whatsoever and I founds your concept somewhat boring to read. You barely provided any information on about twists, challenges, production or basic formatting. It didnt even follow all of the challenges requirments, you were missing a slogan. Overall, not great proposal, I'm sorry to say it. It seems as if you forgot about the challenge and threw this together in 20 minutes. While the idea was good, the execution was rather poor. While it's okay to have a smaller am amount of sentences, you should at least put LOTS of detail into what you have. Once again, apologies to the harsh review.
Creativity: 6/10 Not horrendous, but not the best either.
Detail: 2/10 no details at all, sorry.
Realism: 7/10 While you lacked in other categories, I do see this happening.
Presentation: 5/10 Not much to it, it was pretty bare
Total: 20/40