Arthur Wellesley
Well-Known Member
I think the Pats have a much stronger chance than the Colts now.And the Pats probably have a better chance at topping Seattle than the Colts.
I think the Pats have a much stronger chance than the Colts now.And the Pats probably have a better chance at topping Seattle than the Colts.
I think the Pats have a much stronger chance than the Colts now.
Unless the replacement refs are out there."Usually the team that scores the most points wins the game." - John Madden
Ravens hired Trestman for new OC.
yeah.. not really amused... but he's supposedly a bit QB guy.. so who knows, they could unleash flacco.
as long as he doesn't turn into cutler
I'm so p.o.'d about my Pats right now - why????!!!! There's so much that they do right, not just on the field, so why do this, especially in an easily winable game? I'm sure they're not the only team to have done this at one time or another (AAron Rodgers even mentioned over-inflating balls didn't he?), but this just serves nothing but loss of respect for a team that has had its share of poor choices.
Definitely not the only team - read this:
http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/bucs/...o-have-footballs-altered-before-sb-37/2214490
But that kind of 'altering' of the balls is legit (not how he went about it). The scrimmage balls are scuffed up vs the kicking balls.
Well we hired Gailey. Not sure how I feel about that one.
And per Chris Mortensen - not really sure where this goes or what it means for the Pats:
@mortreport: NFL has found that 11 of the Patriots footballs used in Sunday’s AFC title game were under-inflated by 2 lbs each, per league sources.
Rodgers said that he prefers balls to be over-inflated, because it's a better grip for him. He never said that they actually do, though. He says that he believes most QBs prefer it to be flatter.I'm so p.o.'d about my Pats right now - why????!!!! There's so much that they do right, not just on the field, so why do this, especially in an easily winable game? I'm sure they're not the only team to have done this at one time or another (AAron Rodgers even mentioned over-inflating balls didn't he?), but this just serves nothing but loss of respect for a team that has had its share of poor choices.
I misread it the first time - thought he underinflated them as well as scuffing.
But adding to the interest... listening to Rich Gannon (the losing QB in that game... who is also friends with BJ) on NFL radio this morning.. the ball rules were different back then. back then, there was 100 balls and neither team had any access to them. Unlike now where teams provide their own balls that are inspected before the game.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.