MickeyPeace
Well-Known Member
I would like to say I can't believe this is an article in the New York Times. But I believe it. Great journalism!
The article said 720 calories? Does Disney have a nutrition thing that says 1,000?
Wow!?! the front page of the New York Times? must be a rather slow news day
Brooks Barnes May as well be on Disney PRs payroll
Didnt see any talk of the Turkey Leg price hike in order to place them on the savage dining plan as a "value proposition"I know. Puff piece in advance of the inevitable MM+ fallout?
The significant thing about it is the fact that it's no longer politically correct to enduldge in what is deemed as unhealthy by the calorie snobs.I'm eating my turkey leg. I walk 10 miles a day at Disney.
I don't understand the point of the article, there is nothing significant about it and they sell Turkey Legs at many other events.
That will just be confirmation that they are pulling their headlines from a 10 year old episode of Unwrapped.Next they'll be pickin on Mickey bars.....
The turkey legs have a lot of fat and calories, but how many people totally finish them off anyway?
Hahaha, I thought the same thing!Kind of funny that the girl in the opening picture looks like she's holding back a mouthful of puke.
Personally, I prefer Gaston's skank. It's more tender and juicy and a lot less salty.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.