DisneyHead123
Well-Known Member
I am not familiar with design philosophy, but my guess is that the shared cultural understanding came in at a time when there was a hunger for "authenticity" in fashionable circles in the US. Kind of like how suddenly "street food" was everywhere overnight. As always, however, consumers tend to be fickle and easily distracted by the latest shiny object.The thing is that authenticity of the brand currently being peddled was never the original aim of the parks and resorts, nor do I think this new idea of authenticity is terribly conducive to theme park design. Successful themed design relies on place, time, and shared cultural understanding (in the case of DL and WDW, this will be through a western/American lens). Some of what you’ve said suggests that of these three, only place really matters. It doesn’t matter if a Polynesian artist is too contemporary or has a vision that clashes with the time and unique cultural perspective of the resort; it just matters that he or she is Polynesian.
I think a new baseline of authenticity will remain simply because cultural standards have changed. It is no longer considered acceptable for Westerners to design something that represents another culture with no input from that culture, particularly something that comes across as a bit over-the-top and almost parody like. I think that change will stay. But as far as authenticity being a selling point in and of itself, I think we are at the tail end of that trend.